Sestak-gate, the integrity of Liberals
I got an email from someone remarking on the news that apparently there was another violation of the law by this White House regarding the Colorado race. I decided to sum up the Democrat position regarding Sestak-gate.
Well, if we have the most recent situation to go by...
A job was offered.
A job wasn't offered.
It was a job.
It wasn't a job but an advisory panel.
It wasn't an advisory job because the conflict would have prevented him from taking it.
It was offered once.
The offer was vague and brief.
It was offered over a two month period.
Bill Clinton offered it, but only once.
It would be against the law if it were offered.
It's not against the law because everybody does it.
It's not okay to do it, period.
It is okay if you offer the job but don't state it's a quid pro quo.
And if you have any questions about all the above things that are true and untrue depending on who you ask and what time of day it is, the Press Secretary of the United States will have to refer to counsel despite that this was a perfectly innocuous one-time offer.
Have you got all that?
This is the integrity of Liberals.
Well, if we have the most recent situation to go by...
A job was offered.
A job wasn't offered.
It was a job.
It wasn't a job but an advisory panel.
It wasn't an advisory job because the conflict would have prevented him from taking it.
It was offered once.
The offer was vague and brief.
It was offered over a two month period.
Bill Clinton offered it, but only once.
It would be against the law if it were offered.
It's not against the law because everybody does it.
It's not okay to do it, period.
It is okay if you offer the job but don't state it's a quid pro quo.
And if you have any questions about all the above things that are true and untrue depending on who you ask and what time of day it is, the Press Secretary of the United States will have to refer to counsel despite that this was a perfectly innocuous one-time offer.
Have you got all that?
This is the integrity of Liberals.