Witness the astounding doublethink of Occupy Wall Street
The following link has done some circulating among OWS:
The Occupy Movement Articulates Agenda Just Fine. It's The Media That's Struggling.
Got that? There is no problem with their agenda. They know the agenda. It's all perfectly clear. Okay.
Brace yourself:
"We have all heard that criticism leveled at the Occupy movement-that it can't define a clear, coherent agenda.
But as Chris has already pointed out today in his continued musings on Occupy as Constitutional Convention, that's bullshit. The intentional ambiguity of Occupy is both a deliberate strategic move, and an inevitable reflection of the problems that it is tackling.
It's not the protesters who can't define their agenda. It's the media, the authorities, and the outdated, vertical organizational structures they represent that can't comprehend it."
You see? It's all so obvious -> The Occupy movement articulates its agenda just fine with intentional ambiguity.
Doublethink:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth"
Democrats, including their Occupy Wall Street tools (civilian army?), aren't just wrong. They are dangerous.
The Occupy Movement Articulates Agenda Just Fine. It's The Media That's Struggling.
Got that? There is no problem with their agenda. They know the agenda. It's all perfectly clear. Okay.
Brace yourself:
"We have all heard that criticism leveled at the Occupy movement-that it can't define a clear, coherent agenda.
But as Chris has already pointed out today in his continued musings on Occupy as Constitutional Convention, that's bullshit. The intentional ambiguity of Occupy is both a deliberate strategic move, and an inevitable reflection of the problems that it is tackling.
It's not the protesters who can't define their agenda. It's the media, the authorities, and the outdated, vertical organizational structures they represent that can't comprehend it."
You see? It's all so obvious -> The Occupy movement articulates its agenda just fine with intentional ambiguity.
Doublethink:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth"
Democrats, including their Occupy Wall Street tools (civilian army?), aren't just wrong. They are dangerous.