I think there are definitely aspects of it, such as certain subplots, I don't particularly care for, but I've been comparing it in my mind to another high-profile political show, The West Wing, and I've come to realise that TGW appeals to me much more. Much more ambiguity, and a willingness to show unlikeability in all characters.
My biggest issue with TGW is the shift in emphasis since the first season. Originally inspired by the sex scandal that brought down Governor Eliot Spitzer, it focused on Alicia's new role as major breadwinner for her family, on her need to take on new responsibilities. Many women face these issues. It was not a plot line that was over explored on American TV. I was not fond of the romantic plot with Will, but as long as the writers threw enough road blocks in their way I could live with it. I also would have preferred Peter to not be a very active character.
This year I really dislike the introduction of Blake. The story is supposed to focus on Alicia IMO, not on so many subplots. I also thought that Diane Lockhart was a useful character. I don't know why the writers are getting rid of her.
See, I don't really mind that focus shifts a bit over time. Also, I've grown up with European television, which is.... a bit different. I actually enjoy the Will aspect, but I've never really been all that interested in Peter. OTOH, Titus Welliver's character Glenn Childs really appeals to me, so maybe I could warm to Peter in time. After all, Alicia married him. ;-) And his mother is fabulous if annoying at times (and so are the children) and her weird synergy with Eli Gold is fascinating. (Maybe it's just that Welliver is so awesome that I want more of him on the show.)
Hee, I don't mind Blake's introduction to the show universe even though the character seems very shady. And I wouldn't write Diane Lockhart off yet, by any counts. I mean, even if Cary is off the firm, he's still an active part of the show. And Diane might not even be leaving; something might come up to change her plans.
Comments 4
Reply
I think there are definitely aspects of it, such as certain subplots, I don't particularly care for, but I've been comparing it in my mind to another high-profile political show, The West Wing, and I've come to realise that TGW appeals to me much more. Much more ambiguity, and a willingness to show unlikeability in all characters.
Reply
This year I really dislike the introduction of Blake. The story is supposed to focus on Alicia IMO, not on so many subplots. I also thought that Diane Lockhart was a useful character. I don't know why the writers are getting rid of her.
Reply
Hee, I don't mind Blake's introduction to the show universe even though the character seems very shady. And I wouldn't write Diane Lockhart off yet, by any counts. I mean, even if Cary is off the firm, he's still an active part of the show. And Diane might not even be leaving; something might come up to change her plans.
Reply
Leave a comment