Part of the entry on Hephaestion:
‘For it is equally to the credit of
Hephaestion and
Alexander, that though the former undoubtedly owed his elevation to the personal favour and affection of the king, rather than to any abilities or achievements of his own he never allowed himself to degenerate into the-position of a flatterer or mere favourite, and
(
Read more... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I think Hephaestion just needed the king's favour to make his qualities shine.
And anyway, a historian shouldn't "like" or "dislike" historical facts: he/she should be neutral.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment