Yes, he is a conservative, but he has Libertarian tendencies. And well, your concern with social issues over economics is what makes you a full-fledged democrat, and separates our political opinion.
And the idea that the founding fathers made a system that was made to further involve the government is absurd.
For example: Madison opposed a national central bank; less control of the whole government over money. Jefferson's belief was equivalent to "government that governs least governs best."
The framework of government, and the documents the founding fathers gave us were intended to LIMIT government power.
And I didn't say that the government shouldn't place ANY part at all, and neither does Ron Paul.
If you call the "resolution" bailing out these corporations then I have a hard time you really know what Ron Paul is about. He has been, for SEVERAL years predicting this crisis, and has been opposed to bailing out these corporations since the idea came about because of the problem that the Federal Reserve causes. Not only that, but because of this stupid fucking bailout (which by the way is a very democratic party action, one for which I strongly oppose) we are going to have a longer lasting, WORSE depression in about the next 5 years. Not to mention a large reason (if not the main) is we allowed people who could not afford the loans to get them (because they wanted to make it accessible to lower income groups). But that's the problem, you CANNOT give money to people who DO NOT have any! America is big at fault for living beyond their means, and the democratic bill passed by Clinton allowed it.
Yeah, there needs to be regulation; regulation on the FEDERAL RESERVE which was a terrible idea in the first place. I think you don't understand really Ron Paul's ideals or read propaganda because all of this you're saying has no evidential substance. Here, see from his own mouth:
And the idea that the founding fathers made a system that was made to further involve the government is absurd.
For example:
Madison opposed a national central bank; less control of the whole government over money.
Jefferson's belief was equivalent to "government that governs least governs best."
The framework of government, and the documents the founding fathers gave us were intended to LIMIT government power.
And I didn't say that the government shouldn't place ANY part at all, and neither does Ron Paul.
If you call the "resolution" bailing out these corporations then I have a hard time you really know what Ron Paul is about. He has been, for SEVERAL years predicting this crisis, and has been opposed to bailing out these corporations since the idea came about because of the problem that the Federal Reserve causes.
Not only that, but because of this stupid fucking bailout (which by the way is a very democratic party action, one for which I strongly oppose) we are going to have a longer lasting, WORSE depression in about the next 5 years.
Not to mention a large reason (if not the main) is we allowed people who could not afford the loans to get them (because they wanted to make it accessible to lower income groups). But that's the problem, you CANNOT give money to people who DO NOT have any!
America is big at fault for living beyond their means, and the democratic bill passed by Clinton allowed it.
Yeah, there needs to be regulation; regulation on the FEDERAL RESERVE which was a terrible idea in the first place.
I think you don't understand really Ron Paul's ideals or read propaganda because all of this you're saying has no evidential substance.
Here, see from his own mouth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK2QjMydQpU&feature=related
continuing on next reply...
Reply
Leave a comment