In the post here:
http://community.livejournal.com/lj_2008/3846.html among all the rest of the news and commentary are three items that have people talking and caught my attention (and that takes some serious doing these days -- I promise you.)
Open questions:
Revenue sharing - Should users
( Read more... )
Anyway, I do think you're right, that the statistics seem to imply that fandom is only a very small minority of the 13 million or so user journals that exist, though I wonder at how many of those 13 million journals are even active...
I also think that fandom has definitely adopted LJ as one of its premiere meeting grounds and we're all loathe to leave it. So fandom doesn't just represent $26,000 dollars a month, it represents a possible LIFETIME of organized, supported use and subscription, which I doubt non-fannish users can promise. And fandom is an ever-growing group of people with funds set out for fannish enterprises and interests, willing (like you) to pay for services to better fandom experience. I just think they'd be massively old-fashioned and foolish to not recognize the economic potential in fandom. Alienating us now not only shows arrogance in business ("who CARES if we lose those 13 thousand crazies!") but real ignorance.
Reply
Reply
(and yes! There are kids with handfuls of RP journals. ALSO. 30, Kassie? THAT IS ALOT)
Reply
Reply
Versus $837.00 a day? Yeah, they might notice, but at worst they'd have to fire somebody or three.
i.e. the proposed economic models have potential to actually increase LJ's bottom line, and at the same time, possibly wreak some real havoc within fandom, the same way FanLib could. It's the same case of fans taking all the risks and reaping little profit except as a token.
I'm not saying it will happen or that LJ doesn't massively overstate their actual active user base (paying or not) -- and in this, I'm only talking about subscription fees for paid journals -- ad revenue is a whole other animal and if they were going to offer profit sharing back to the ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I'm more worried about what holding out this kind of reward system might be more damaging to fandom as a whole than pretending we don't exist.
Yes, true. Honestly, I've been so frustrated with the possible 'censorship' issues to even think about this until reading your post. But you're right. That is definitely a massive issue. I think it's only fair that their company benefits from 'disposable fannish income', which I know others do (conventions, etc), but for FANDOM itself to take advantage of fandom is really reprehensible.
Reply
I disagree. I think LJ is a stepping stone to something else. Just like usenet, Bulletin Boards, and e-mail groups were stepping stones to LJ. I think it's become increasingly clear that we're all just waiting for the next big thing. We're here because our friends are here, not because LJ itself is inherently better than IJ, GJ, etc.
Reply
Leave a comment