mutilation or alteration?

[maxwella_demon]

I'm currently writing an (overdue) essay on female genital circumcision in regards to whether it is a cultural or barbaric practice... and the only scholarly work I can find on it says its all cultural. Apparently its not as bad for the health as everyone says it is and amnesty had it all wrong, but I'm not convinced...

Comments

[cassie_lee]

when done against will and with horrible rusty objects... I'd have to say barbaric. Was the author a guy? Possibly Jewish? :p

so is it 'female genital circumcision' when it's cultural and 'female genital mutilation' when it's barbaric? Or are those two officially separate things?

[maxwella_demon]

yeah the article was written by a guy although i doubt jewish, he was totally against jewish male circumcision as it is done without consent as a child with spurious 'health benefits'. big plus apparently in africa, you do get to give consent after choosing a) get circumcised with risk of death due to serverity of circumcision/rusty implements because msf just aren't prioritising this over say aids or b) be unclean and never get married/face possible ostracision.

this guy is like, 'listen people, i'm a relativist i don't believe in universal truths, declaration of human rights big swiss conspiracy, no way its relevant to anyone who isn't white and eats fondue so there...'

i could be twisting his words just a little :P you can probably see why i'm not pursuing a career as an academic

[maxwella_demon]

and by ostracision i mean ostracism...

kinda cool concept though, get kicked and SLICED out of the group...

[cassie_lee]

cos it needs to be worse for them...

[cassie_lee]

figures he'd be against male circumcision.

it's ok, you should see what happens when I help Matt with his philosphy assignments, hehehe.