No Cure for Cancer?

Oct 02, 2003 15:19

This is a public post because I feel this is very important ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 4

completely offtopic g33kgrrl October 2 2003, 15:02:59 UTC
do you mind if I post a link to the picture of us from last night on my journal? I'd probably leave it as public which is why I ask.

Reply

Re: completely offtopic mavra_chang October 2 2003, 17:08:34 UTC
ok

Reply


touji October 2 2003, 20:18:39 UTC
If it does what the site says it does then it would've been nice of them to put my dad on it instead of taking half of his internal organs out. Oh well; dad's alive, kicking, and doing well. I guess that's the important thing.

Reply


ankh_f_n_khonsu December 14 2003, 02:10:33 UTC
Greetings, stumbled upon the entry and thought it relevant to opine:

Wilhelm Reich found a "cure" for most forms of cancer circa 1945.

Other homeopathic remedies have proved comparably successful (e.g. oxygen dosing).

Anyone who goes on chemo doesn't have the slightest clue what they're doing.

I'm curious though, if this substance/treatment is intended to be used for AIDS patients, on what basis is that determined? ELISA, WB, and viral load test for proteins. Neither HIV nor AIDS has ever been isolated. Neither HIV nor AIDS has ever been proven to be cytotoxic, indeed, all epdiemological evidence suggests that HIV can not cause AIDS or any other malady.

The "powers that be" don't want any threat to the paradigm. The standard practice is life-long subservience and consumption of cytotoxic pharmaceuticals. I don't foresee this or any other outside solution as being allowed to propogate.

Namaste.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up