I am delighted by last night's victory of Scott Brown for the Senate seat in Massachusetts. Not only will this likely mean the death of the gargantuan monstrosity known as the Health Care bill, it also means that the Democrats will have to ask themselves what's really important to them, and perhaps, it will even lead some of them to actually try
(
Read more... )
Second, the bills funnels more money toward abortion providers and I think you know how strongly I feel about that.
Third, this wasn't about actually improving health care in America so much as getting the government more involved and calling it health care reform. If this were really about improving health care, it would not have come down to a "just pass something" mentality which is what this turned into.
Fourth, this will lead to increased costs in the health care industry. If we examine other countries such as England and Canada, we discover that they are trying to find ways to cut back, and the way they do this is to eliminate services. This has been especially bad in England. And we know this is going to raise costs because they had to use budgeting gimmicks to count inlays in early years while outlays didn't start for a few more years in order to say it was budget neutral or that it would save money. I call that plain lying.
So what does this bill do? It's going to create another beaurocracy in Washington, bilk taxpayers for more money, lead to increased denial of services in order to save money (saving lives is not on the agenda), lead to my taxpayer dollars being used to kill innocent children, and it was done merely so the Democratic party could say it had passed health care.
While I am delighted by Scott Brown's victory, the Democratic party used a parliamentary trick to pass Health Care anyway. I assure you I will not be voting for Democrats at any level for a very long time thanks to this (and other things).
I do not expect the entire bill to be repealed as such, and certainly not while Obama is in office. Like all big government/controversial laws, most of it isn't set to go into effect until after the next election. I do not know whether this will lead to his losing in 2012, but I do think it's going to cost some Democrats this November.
But if this law isn't seriously changed, it's going to cost all of us in the long run.
Dominus tecum
Reply
That is how it is helping me.
As it stands, I still use the ER as my doctor and will have to until things change.
Reply
You may see some short term improvements for yourself, but over the long run, this is going to reduce the quality and availability of coverage and health care in general.
Dominus tecum
Reply
Free market price, do you know what that is? The latest quote I got was $1200 a month for a $5000 deductible and separate $1000 deductible on drugs. Over 50% of my take home income.
Paying it with my employer? Less than a tenth of my paycheck.
Reply
Dominus tecum
Reply
Rescission of insurance contracts? I've had that happen to me three times in my life.
Once at 9months, once at 17, once at 18.
Reply
I'm sorry if I sound unsympathetic, I'm not. I just cannot do anything different than what I am.
Dominus tecum
Reply
Make peace with God and let yourself go in peace, stop fighting to steal my money, you shouldn't steal to live. I would let myself die if I was in your situation
Reply
Most religious folks I know oppose it do so for the reasons I've listed, especially the abortion one.
Dominus tecum
Reply
Reply
Further, no major Pro-life group was convinced by this act in the slightest so it's hard to suggest that it's really abortion neutral. That's my perspective on it.
Dominus tecum
Reply
Reply
Dominus tecum
Reply
Sorry, that probably came across too harshly. I know the Church has helped you, I take that into account. But you should take into account the number of lives it has ruined. One of my cousins committed suicide a few weeks ago.
Why?
He had joined one of the lawsuits, because he was repeatedly molested and raped by a priest when he was younger, the priest is still practicing. The church, my relatives nearby, basically treated him as a nonentity and said he was a liar. He lost the innocence of his childhood and then the will to live.
And now we have a Pope in there that might have helped cover up these horrific acts.
What would happen if we had a President who could be shown to be involved with something like this as much as the Pope has? I don't think they'd be President for long.
Reply
I could go on but I won't. I don't think it does either of us any good at this point. The Church is filled with men and women who are very much like the rest of us, human beings. It is to He whom the Church points that I wish to know better.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this, Pathia, and for listening to mine.
Dominus tecum
Reply
Dominus tecum
Reply
Leave a comment