AIDS: The Facts.

Nov 20, 2006 09:31

http://www.whatisaids.com/wwwboard/messages/368.html

In the commentary of Ron Jeremy's movie, Ron said AIDS was mostly a homosexual male's disease and IV drug users' disease in North America. He explained that at the HIV clinic he would get his monthly tests at, ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

zermatt November 23 2006, 14:11:36 UTC
I would like to hear the opinion of someone with a degree in medicine on this 1.

Reply

mattcanning November 23 2006, 15:17:32 UTC
CLICK HERE

Notice how he skirts around the issue and in no spot mentions that straight males are at high risk? He simply runs that whole spiel along saying straight men "may" contract the virus. Yeah - and I "may" get struck by lightning.

It's a gay man and IV drug users' disease in North America. Not sure what part of this people don't get, but with brainwashing being as it was, we are conditioned to think it is not.

Usually people will see the facts and just want to say they are wrong, knowing how silly that would be. It's hard to undue years of programming telling us something else was true.

Don't shoot the messenger.

Female-to-female HIV transmission is SO RARE, that even this guy (who is biased because he works for the AIDS foundation) actually points out that it is rare. That means it is so rare it is probably like one in 1,000,000,000. So rare that you couldn't possibly try to scare lesbians about HIV because then the propaganda would be too much of a joke even for that.

I also like how he says "Bottom line -- what ( ... )

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

mattcanning November 26 2006, 21:42:11 UTC
The heading reads "anal receptive sex."

No straight men ever has anal receptive sex. It is a homosexual act, so if you're doing it you aren't technically straight. The odds of transmission for the person receiving anal sex is 40 times higher than vaginal insertive sex - the kind of sex I would be having and other straight men would be having. The risk is about 20 times higher than for anal insertive sex compared to vaginal insertive, but that doesn't concern me since I won't be doing it. All I know is that for the particular type of sex that I have as a straight male, the odds are very low of contracting HIV ( ... )

Reply

ianfromvaya November 29 2006, 15:16:07 UTC
generally, straight men don't like anything NEAR their asses.
But thats just an observation.

Reply

mattcanning November 29 2006, 20:20:12 UTC
Yeah - you'd think that would be pretty easy to figure out right? I guess not.

Look at Geoff's quote here:

"In any population where unprotected sex with many different partners is the norm, you're going to have a much higher rate of STD spread. And that was the norm for a lot of the gay male community in America in the 1970s and 1980s. Which is a perfectly logical thing to happen when you tell hundreds of thousands of horny men that can't have open, socially accepted relationships, and instead have to seek gratification furtively."Notice the politically correct liberal spin he throws in there? Trying to blame the heterosexual community for the promiscuity in the homosexual community? This isn't difficult to figure out either: homosexuals don't have more unprotected sex because they are somehow being oppressed by the heterosexual community. Condoms are freely available and it's not like they can't be used just because homosexuals are under more social pressure to hide their sexuality and sexual activity. Like I said, that is a ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up