http://www.whatisaids.com/wwwboard/messages/368.html In the commentary of
Ron Jeremy's movie, Ron said AIDS was mostly a homosexual male's disease and IV drug users' disease in North America. He explained that at the HIV clinic he would get his monthly tests at,
(
Read more... )
The per-contact probability of HIV transmission for vaginal insertive sex is 0.02%, not 0.2%. Meaning the odds of a straight male contracting HIV through a woman is 1 in 5,000. Check the references if you wish, that is scientific fact, not opinion.
So anal receptive sex is 40 times more likely to transmit HIV than vaginal insertive sex.
I get the point that the disease "doesn't discriminate" in a traditional sense of the word, but anal sex is far more dangerous, and what exactly is a person like me not receiving? Anal sex. And what are homosexuals receiving? [...] That's my point. I also have no plans on ever having anal sex with a woman.
You are right that if everyone used protection that incidence of the spread of HIV would be much lower though.
"But the politically incorrect truth is rarely spoken out loud: The dreaded heterosexual epidemic never happened."
"Female to male transmission is very inefficient, says Dr. Nancy Padian a professor in the department of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive science at the University of California, San Francisco and the author of a 1996 10 year study of HIV infected heterosexual couples, the nation's longest and largest. She points out that "it's two to three times easier for men to infect women." But even so, if there are no other risk factors involved, the rate at which an infected man will transmit the virus to a woman is one in 1,100 sex acts."
http://www.whatisaids.com/wwwboard/messages/368.html
Facts, even facts like these, are never more dangerous than lying to people.
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Let's see if this person comes back...
Reply
Leave a comment