When Atheists Have Their Say

[matt_arnold]

Edge.org brought my attention to responses in the letters column of the New York Times (quoted below the cut), by the three atheists most prominently cited in the resurgence of outspoken atheism-- Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett. They plead for the simplicity and gentleness of their positions, against the reputations they are

Comments

[jer_]

I think cruel overstates the case. I'm currently finishing the last two or three chapters of "The God Delusion" and I can say that, from my perspective, Dawkins strays into "bitterness" relatively frequently.

Caveat: I don't think that the bitterness he conveys is uncalled for.

You cannot read Dawkins' book and feel that he is playing the unbiased commentator that he is trying to be. He definitely casts judgements. The question is, about what is he casting judgement, and is it taking "potshots" or rational?

He takes shots at those who hide behind the "religious immunity" from critique. He takes shots at those who ignore science in favor of religion. He outright name-calls in several parts of his book when discussing religious indoctrination. Of this, there is no question, it is in black & white...

But he is (to a large extent) right. The shots he's taking are necessary, and have been avoided for far too long. Are they mean? Yes, certainly.. but no more mean than is warranted, or acceptable when arguing ANYTHING else.

By the way, anyone that hasn't read "The God Delusion" should, regardless of your beliefs. It's an excellent book, and I say this as someone who still believes in a supreme being.