More Abstract Algebra!

Oct 05, 2009 20:47

I have not posted in a while, but I have some more questions ( Read more... )

subdomains, integral domains, rings, abstract algebra

Leave a comment

joshua_green October 6 2009, 02:59:17 UTC
1. I think it's going to be difficult to make matrices work for this one, though they are standard things to keep in mind.  I'd consider one of the standard extensions of C.

2. What must be in R?  What does that generate?

3. What must be in any subdomain of Z?  What does that generate?

4. What must be in any subdomain of Z/(pZ)?  What does that generate?

Reply

mathic October 6 2009, 04:38:36 UTC
I think most of the standard matrix groups work, no? Granted it may be difficult to show without knowledge of determinants.

Reply

joshua_green October 6 2009, 11:59:07 UTC
What standard matrix groups are closed under addition?

Reply

mathic October 6 2009, 15:38:45 UTC
Ha, I knew I was missing something.. however I can still think of two :)

Less standard.. but as long as you pick some well placed zeros, it's closed under addition and multiplication

Reply

headf1rst13 October 7 2009, 23:27:02 UTC
1. H, the ring of quaternions. Cool. Thanks.

2. Gotcha... thanks.

3. Had that from the previous comment. But thank you too.

4. Still confused... the a subdomain of Z/(pZ) must have the element 1, and this will generate all of Z/(pZ)... but I still don't know how to show that there are no other subdomains besides itself. I mean clearly a subset of Zp is not going to be closed under the operations mod p, so no subsets can be subdomains, but I'm not sure what you are getting at.

Reply

joshua_green October 8 2009, 04:38:58 UTC
For 4, you're already done!  You've shown that any subdomain must contain 1, hence contain all of Z/(pZ), hence equal Z/(pZ).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up