TM 273: Watchmen
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" (Who watches the watchmen?)
...You know, haven't I made my opinions on this topic (or the like) clear often enough? Do I really need to go into it again? I swear, some days these seem like they're just out to irritate me.
As far as I can see, the answer is rather plainly no one. Including the arm of the government that is tasked with doing just that.
Which is more than obvious by some of the fairly recent situations. Since if anyone had been keeping an eye on some of those holier-than-thou, hypocri --
Well.
Trying to make the world run on if-onlys is a damn fool's game.
And despite my old friend's opinion on the same, I'm not sure I'd care to deal with Waller that closely. Especially after some of the other things I've heard recently -- and with a few of the JSA tied up in Checkmate, now -- it's not likely any of that is going to change.
New day, same old broken systems.
Anyone actually surprised?
...You know, haven't I made my opinions on this topic (or the like) clear often enough? Do I really need to go into it again? I swear, some days these seem like they're just out to irritate me.
As far as I can see, the answer is rather plainly no one. Including the arm of the government that is tasked with doing just that.
Which is more than obvious by some of the fairly recent situations. Since if anyone had been keeping an eye on some of those holier-than-thou, hypocri --
Well.
Trying to make the world run on if-onlys is a damn fool's game.
And despite my old friend's opinion on the same, I'm not sure I'd care to deal with Waller that closely. Especially after some of the other things I've heard recently -- and with a few of the JSA tied up in Checkmate, now -- it's not likely any of that is going to change.
New day, same old broken systems.
Anyone actually surprised?