Brenda Rodriguez is trying to screw me. Another deadbeat client
Hi. Im tim. I write term papers for people. On friday o wrote a term paper for brenda Rodriguez
She claimed she couldnt use it and the professor didnt accept it.
Brenda Rodriguez is full of shit.
She owes me $125
If you teach brenda Rodriguez she hired me to write a paper.
I bet this looks familiar
Brenda May 9IntroductionOne of the most long lasting controversies is childhood development is spanking. Spanking is the act of slapping a child on the bottom in a way that hurts slightly but mostly humiliates and lets the child know that they are misbehaving. For some, this is a harmless act that disciplines without causing damaging, something that adults pay for in the more discerning clubs. For others, this is child abuse and should never be employed against any child ever. In this paper, I will discuss the arguments in favor of and against spanking. Pro-Spanking ArgumentsThere are two major arguments in favor of spanking. The first is that spanking is disciplined and children need to be disciplined. Often we see an incorrigible adult and think that someone should have spanked them when they were children. Or we see children running around screaming while their parents threaten to put them in “time out.” Only their parents never put them in time out and they continue to scream. When it comes to attachment theory, there are some who argue that spanking does not control behavior. In fact, it makes behavior worse. However, we can dispute several the arguments against spanking as beliefs more than researched outcomes. According to some “the experience of being spanked and thus physically hurt by their parents can interfere with children’s closeness to and trust of their parents, which in turn undermines parents’ socialization messages about appropriate behavior” (Gershoff et al 2018, p. 110). However, this negative
socialization tends to be more theoretical than actual. People with distant relationships with their parents have upbringings that range from abusive to perfectly cordial without corporal punishment. Furthermore, there are many who have close relationships with their parents who do not see spanking as distancing. In many ways, the spanking is not as important as the rationales for spanking and the context of the spanking. An argument for spanking is the acceptance of spanking as a form of punishment of those who had been spanked as children. “Adolescents who had been spanked by their mothers were more accepting of it than other adolescents” (Afifi et al 2022, p. 3) This is not the same story when it comes to child. People who grew up being punched or kicked or severely beaten when they were children do think of that as a positive part of their childhoods. In fact, they either do everything they can to prevent repeating that behavior or they feel shame when they beat their own children. Adolescents and adults who were spanked as children are generally fine with spanking. They are not fine with beating or verbal abuse. They certainly don't wish that their parents had killed them. Whatever their relationship with their parents, spanking was not a negative factor. The second argument in favor of spanking is cultural. Not every culture views spanking as child abuse. More importantly, parents who spank their children should not be placed in the same category as parents who try to drown their children in the bathtub or parents who chain their children to radiators whenever company comes over. There is a great deal of literature that assumes that spanking is just as bad as physical violence (hitting, punching, breaking arms, etc.) Trevor Noah has a comedy routine about how a school in Africa promised Oprah Winfrey that they wouldn't spank their students. And then turned around and continued to beat their students because spanking is a cute little act and the students need way more punishment if socialization tends to be more theoretical than actual. People with distant relationships with their parents have upbringings that range from abusive to perfectly cordial without corporal punishment. Furthermore, there are many who have close relationships with their parents who do not see spanking as distancing. In many ways, the spanking is not as important as the rationales for spanking and the context of the spanking. An argument for spanking is the acceptance of spanking as a form of punishment of those who had been spanked as children. “Adolescents who had been spanked by their mothers were more accepting of it than other adolescents” (Afifi et al 2022, p. 3) This is not the same story when it comes to child. People who grew up being punched or kicked or severely beaten when they were children do think of that as a positive part of their childhoods. In fact, they either do everything they can to prevent repeating that behavior or they feel shame when they beat their own children. Adolescents and adults who were spanked as children are generally fine with spanking. They are not fine with beating or verbal abuse. They certainly don't wish that their parents had killed them. Whatever their relationship with their parents, spanking was not a negative factor. The second argument in favor of spanking is cultural. Not every culture views spanking as child abuse. More importantly, parents who spank their children should not be placed in the same category as parents who try to drown their children in the bathtub or parents who chain their children to radiators whenever company comes over. There is a great deal of literature that assumes that spanking is just as bad as physical violence (hitting, punching, breaking arms, etc.) Trevor Noah has a comedy routine about how a school in Africa promised Oprah Winfrey that they wouldn't spank their students. And then turned around and continued to beat their students because spanking is a cute little act and the students need way more punishment if socialization tends to be more theoretical than actual. People with distant relationships with their parents have upbringings that range from abusive to perfectly cordial without corporal punishment. Furthermore, there are many who have close relationships with their parents who do not see spanking as distancing. In many ways, the spanking is not as important as the rationales for spanking and the context of the spanking. An argument for spanking is the acceptance of spanking as a form of punishment of those who had been spanked as children. “Adolescents who had been spanked by their mothers were more accepting of it than other adolescents” (Afifi et al 2022, p. 3) This is not the same story when it comes to child. People who grew up being punched or kicked or severely beaten when they were children do think of that as a positive part of their childhoods. In fact, they either do everything they can to prevent repeating that behavior or they feel shame when they beat their own children. Adolescents and adults who were spanked as children are generally fine with spanking. They are not fine with beating or verbal abuse. They certainly don't wish that their parents had killed them. Whatever their relationship with their parents, spanking was not a negative factor. The second argument in favor of spanking is cultural. Not every culture views spanking as child abuse. More importantly, parents who spank their children should not be placed in the same category as parents who try to drown their children in the bathtub or parents who chain their children to radiators whenever company comes over. There is a great deal of literature that assumes that spanking is just as bad as physical violence (hitting, punching, breaking arms, etc.) Trevor Noah has a comedy routine about how a school in Africa promised Oprah Winfrey that they wouldn't spank their students. And then turned around and continued to beat their students because spanking is a cute little act and the students need way more punishment if they are ever going to behave. This might actually be an argument against spanking since people who accept spanking as a corporal punishment may see it as a small punishment on the way to greater punishments. Even as spanking is a common form of punishment, there's a great deal of evidence that really doesn't bear out when it comes to negative outcomes. For example, one study on spanking tried to draw a correlation between spanking and socioeconomic development. “Results from multilevel models show that reports of spanking of children in the household were associated with lower scores on a 3-item socioemotional development index among 3- and 4-year-old children. Country-level results from the multilevel model showed 59 countries (95%) had a negative relationship between spanking and socioemotional development and 3 countries (5%) had a null relationship. Spanking was not associated with higher socioemotional development for children in any country.” (Pace et al 2019). Again we have a scale of socio-emotional development that was put forth by a wealthy “first world” privilege and applied to poorer nations. Again, correlation and causation are too far apart to truly give an argument. There are many reasons why a child who grows up in a lower to middle income country would have poor coping skills including poverty, discrimination, exploitationAnti-Spanking ArgumentsOne of the first arguments against spanking is the moral argument. For many, there is no moral justification for hitting a child no matter the context. This argument posits that any arguments about hitting a child from love or discipline are specious and self-serving. Many of the research studies associated with spanking take it as a shared assumption that spanking is socialization tends to be more theoretical than actual. People with distant relationships with their parents have upbringings that range from abusive to perfectly cordial without corporal punishment. Furthermore, there are many who have close relationships with their parents who do not see spanking as distancing. In many ways, the spanking is not as important as the rationales for spanking and the context of the spanking. An argument for spanking is the acceptance of spanking as a form of punishment of those who had been spanked as children. “Adolescents who had been spanked by their mothers were more accepting of it than other adolescents” (Afifi et al 2022, p. 3) This is not the same story when it comes to child. People who grew up being punched or kicked or severely beaten when they were children do think of that as a positive part of their childhoods. In fact, they either do everything they can to prevent repeating that behavior or they feel shame when they beat their own children. Adolescents and adults who were spanked as children are generally fine with spanking. They are not fine with beating or verbal abuse. They certainly don't wish that their parents had killed them. Whatever their relationship with their parents, spanking was not a negative factor. The second argument in favor of spanking is cultural. Not every culture views spanking as child abuse. More importantly, parents who spank their children should not be placed in the same category as parents who try to drown their children in the bathtub or parents who chain their children to radiators whenever company comes over. There is a great deal of literature that assumes that spanking is just as bad as physical violence (hitting, punching, breaking arms, etc.) Trevor Noah has a comedy routine about how a school in Africa promised Oprah Winfrey that they wouldn't spank their students. And then turned around and continued to beat their students because spanking is a cute little act and the students need way more punishment if
She claimed she couldnt use it and the professor didnt accept it.
Brenda Rodriguez is full of shit.
She owes me $125
If you teach brenda Rodriguez she hired me to write a paper.
I bet this looks familiar
Brenda May 9IntroductionOne of the most long lasting controversies is childhood development is spanking. Spanking is the act of slapping a child on the bottom in a way that hurts slightly but mostly humiliates and lets the child know that they are misbehaving. For some, this is a harmless act that disciplines without causing damaging, something that adults pay for in the more discerning clubs. For others, this is child abuse and should never be employed against any child ever. In this paper, I will discuss the arguments in favor of and against spanking. Pro-Spanking ArgumentsThere are two major arguments in favor of spanking. The first is that spanking is disciplined and children need to be disciplined. Often we see an incorrigible adult and think that someone should have spanked them when they were children. Or we see children running around screaming while their parents threaten to put them in “time out.” Only their parents never put them in time out and they continue to scream. When it comes to attachment theory, there are some who argue that spanking does not control behavior. In fact, it makes behavior worse. However, we can dispute several the arguments against spanking as beliefs more than researched outcomes. According to some “the experience of being spanked and thus physically hurt by their parents can interfere with children’s closeness to and trust of their parents, which in turn undermines parents’ socialization messages about appropriate behavior” (Gershoff et al 2018, p. 110). However, this negative
socialization tends to be more theoretical than actual. People with distant relationships with their parents have upbringings that range from abusive to perfectly cordial without corporal punishment. Furthermore, there are many who have close relationships with their parents who do not see spanking as distancing. In many ways, the spanking is not as important as the rationales for spanking and the context of the spanking. An argument for spanking is the acceptance of spanking as a form of punishment of those who had been spanked as children. “Adolescents who had been spanked by their mothers were more accepting of it than other adolescents” (Afifi et al 2022, p. 3) This is not the same story when it comes to child. People who grew up being punched or kicked or severely beaten when they were children do think of that as a positive part of their childhoods. In fact, they either do everything they can to prevent repeating that behavior or they feel shame when they beat their own children. Adolescents and adults who were spanked as children are generally fine with spanking. They are not fine with beating or verbal abuse. They certainly don't wish that their parents had killed them. Whatever their relationship with their parents, spanking was not a negative factor. The second argument in favor of spanking is cultural. Not every culture views spanking as child abuse. More importantly, parents who spank their children should not be placed in the same category as parents who try to drown their children in the bathtub or parents who chain their children to radiators whenever company comes over. There is a great deal of literature that assumes that spanking is just as bad as physical violence (hitting, punching, breaking arms, etc.) Trevor Noah has a comedy routine about how a school in Africa promised Oprah Winfrey that they wouldn't spank their students. And then turned around and continued to beat their students because spanking is a cute little act and the students need way more punishment if socialization tends to be more theoretical than actual. People with distant relationships with their parents have upbringings that range from abusive to perfectly cordial without corporal punishment. Furthermore, there are many who have close relationships with their parents who do not see spanking as distancing. In many ways, the spanking is not as important as the rationales for spanking and the context of the spanking. An argument for spanking is the acceptance of spanking as a form of punishment of those who had been spanked as children. “Adolescents who had been spanked by their mothers were more accepting of it than other adolescents” (Afifi et al 2022, p. 3) This is not the same story when it comes to child. People who grew up being punched or kicked or severely beaten when they were children do think of that as a positive part of their childhoods. In fact, they either do everything they can to prevent repeating that behavior or they feel shame when they beat their own children. Adolescents and adults who were spanked as children are generally fine with spanking. They are not fine with beating or verbal abuse. They certainly don't wish that their parents had killed them. Whatever their relationship with their parents, spanking was not a negative factor. The second argument in favor of spanking is cultural. Not every culture views spanking as child abuse. More importantly, parents who spank their children should not be placed in the same category as parents who try to drown their children in the bathtub or parents who chain their children to radiators whenever company comes over. There is a great deal of literature that assumes that spanking is just as bad as physical violence (hitting, punching, breaking arms, etc.) Trevor Noah has a comedy routine about how a school in Africa promised Oprah Winfrey that they wouldn't spank their students. And then turned around and continued to beat their students because spanking is a cute little act and the students need way more punishment if socialization tends to be more theoretical than actual. People with distant relationships with their parents have upbringings that range from abusive to perfectly cordial without corporal punishment. Furthermore, there are many who have close relationships with their parents who do not see spanking as distancing. In many ways, the spanking is not as important as the rationales for spanking and the context of the spanking. An argument for spanking is the acceptance of spanking as a form of punishment of those who had been spanked as children. “Adolescents who had been spanked by their mothers were more accepting of it than other adolescents” (Afifi et al 2022, p. 3) This is not the same story when it comes to child. People who grew up being punched or kicked or severely beaten when they were children do think of that as a positive part of their childhoods. In fact, they either do everything they can to prevent repeating that behavior or they feel shame when they beat their own children. Adolescents and adults who were spanked as children are generally fine with spanking. They are not fine with beating or verbal abuse. They certainly don't wish that their parents had killed them. Whatever their relationship with their parents, spanking was not a negative factor. The second argument in favor of spanking is cultural. Not every culture views spanking as child abuse. More importantly, parents who spank their children should not be placed in the same category as parents who try to drown their children in the bathtub or parents who chain their children to radiators whenever company comes over. There is a great deal of literature that assumes that spanking is just as bad as physical violence (hitting, punching, breaking arms, etc.) Trevor Noah has a comedy routine about how a school in Africa promised Oprah Winfrey that they wouldn't spank their students. And then turned around and continued to beat their students because spanking is a cute little act and the students need way more punishment if they are ever going to behave. This might actually be an argument against spanking since people who accept spanking as a corporal punishment may see it as a small punishment on the way to greater punishments. Even as spanking is a common form of punishment, there's a great deal of evidence that really doesn't bear out when it comes to negative outcomes. For example, one study on spanking tried to draw a correlation between spanking and socioeconomic development. “Results from multilevel models show that reports of spanking of children in the household were associated with lower scores on a 3-item socioemotional development index among 3- and 4-year-old children. Country-level results from the multilevel model showed 59 countries (95%) had a negative relationship between spanking and socioemotional development and 3 countries (5%) had a null relationship. Spanking was not associated with higher socioemotional development for children in any country.” (Pace et al 2019). Again we have a scale of socio-emotional development that was put forth by a wealthy “first world” privilege and applied to poorer nations. Again, correlation and causation are too far apart to truly give an argument. There are many reasons why a child who grows up in a lower to middle income country would have poor coping skills including poverty, discrimination, exploitationAnti-Spanking ArgumentsOne of the first arguments against spanking is the moral argument. For many, there is no moral justification for hitting a child no matter the context. This argument posits that any arguments about hitting a child from love or discipline are specious and self-serving. Many of the research studies associated with spanking take it as a shared assumption that spanking is socialization tends to be more theoretical than actual. People with distant relationships with their parents have upbringings that range from abusive to perfectly cordial without corporal punishment. Furthermore, there are many who have close relationships with their parents who do not see spanking as distancing. In many ways, the spanking is not as important as the rationales for spanking and the context of the spanking. An argument for spanking is the acceptance of spanking as a form of punishment of those who had been spanked as children. “Adolescents who had been spanked by their mothers were more accepting of it than other adolescents” (Afifi et al 2022, p. 3) This is not the same story when it comes to child. People who grew up being punched or kicked or severely beaten when they were children do think of that as a positive part of their childhoods. In fact, they either do everything they can to prevent repeating that behavior or they feel shame when they beat their own children. Adolescents and adults who were spanked as children are generally fine with spanking. They are not fine with beating or verbal abuse. They certainly don't wish that their parents had killed them. Whatever their relationship with their parents, spanking was not a negative factor. The second argument in favor of spanking is cultural. Not every culture views spanking as child abuse. More importantly, parents who spank their children should not be placed in the same category as parents who try to drown their children in the bathtub or parents who chain their children to radiators whenever company comes over. There is a great deal of literature that assumes that spanking is just as bad as physical violence (hitting, punching, breaking arms, etc.) Trevor Noah has a comedy routine about how a school in Africa promised Oprah Winfrey that they wouldn't spank their students. And then turned around and continued to beat their students because spanking is a cute little act and the students need way more punishment if