So, as I mentioned in my last post, SFSignal contacted me to ask me to contribute to a
"What Science Fiction Books Should Be in Every Fan's Library?" discussion. This was moderately surprising, since a couple of short stories aside, I don't feel very much like a science fiction writer, and I'm certainly not even a minor voice in the science fiction
(
Read more... )
Comments 11
Reply
Reply
Reply
But yeah, that book just seemed to scream for a couple of sequels. I'm not sure how comfortable the author was in the genre, though - and any sequel would have had to be far more "science fictiony," I think. Still, I'd love to know what happened to the four of them.
Reply
Reply
Reply
I HATED The Handmaid's Tale (found it obvious, trite, uninspiring - and did I mention obvious?) but I still applaud you for putting it into the list - I think it's important that work classified by the clueless as "mainstream" be placed in the correct genre. Plus, it should give Atwood fits.
Reply
I expect that the only way Margaret Atwood will see this list is if she Googles herself, and possibly not even then. So I'm not overly worried about her reaction.
With that said, I think that Cats Eye and The Blind Assassin are better Atwood novels, but I wouldn't categorize either as science fiction.
Reply
I was referring to this list, and I'm happy that Blind Assassin is better. It's in my TBR pile, and I wasn't really expecting to be impressed with it, but you've given me hope.
Reply
Of her books I thought Doomsday book was one of the best, but not one to read for fun.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment