Catholic Vampires

[manfleshbuffet]

I am a scientist and a cannibal. I'm just interpreting the facts and eating corpses (respectively). If you disagree with what I have to say, thats your problem. Don't go complaining that I'm a "Bad Person" or a "Dick" or a "Beaver Hugging Japanese 'tax-payer' who eats people". I have feelings too.

But anyways, I thought I'd share my finding on why

Comments

jack

[anonymous]

=O

You're really up on your research man...kudos.

I don't think I have anything else to say...or rather, if I said what I was thinking, most people reading this would hate me.

gg m8

Re: jack

[manfleshbuffet]

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

We live in America. God bless the first amendment. I encourage that you all speak your mind in these comments, even if you disagree with me. I enjoy feedback of whatever nature.

jack

[anonymous]

Actually, I wasn't gonna disagree with you though, I was gonna agree with you in a radical way...thus people being pissed at me.

Anywho...if you were a cannibal but didn't hold to catholic beliefs, would that make you bad?

Re: jack

[manfleshbuffet]

Thats a very good question. Ever since the separation of church and state, the word "bad" has undergone a significant transformation. "Bad" was originally defined as "Evil or Sinful". Today, it is defined as "Undesirable". You may see it as two completely different meanings, but really it is a fantastic example of how the world has changed for the "worse" (define this word as you desire). Society before the death of God worried about what was ethical and right. Today, society is primarily concerned with looks and what feels good. "Yesterday, a soldier held captive in Iraq for three months was forced to eat one of his fallen allies in order to stay alive. He is a bad human being." Aside from the lack of writing skills and the bluntness in general, I would not be surprised if I saw this in a newspaper sometime this decade

jack

[anonymous]

Two questions then...
1)If I asked permisssion to kill someone and eat them, and they in their right mind said yes, would it still be bad?

2)Do you know anything about the acceptability of passive (or even active) cannibalism in other religions (mainly Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism)?

Re: jack

[manfleshbuffet]

1. Getting permission doesn't change the way society will feel about it, and a murder will still be considered "unlawful". It is still "bad" in accordance to the rest of the world. It is a form of active cannibalism and should be treated as a murder.

However...

With consent from a person, you can lawfully commit passive cannibalism on a corpse and nobody can really stop you. Without permission, you risk "unlawfulness".

2. I have not looked into these religions and know very little about them. I do know, however, that Hindu's are very picky about what animals you can eat. From what I understand, Hindu's are firm desbelievers of cannibalism. I may be wrong though, so I will look into this.

Re: jack

[n_a_j_i]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/germany/article/0,2763,1099477,00.html#article_continue

Re: jack

[manfleshbuffet]

Yeah I've read that story before. I've seen in several accounts that human flesh tasted like pork. Also, this shines light on the question Jack had concerning consent from the human to be eaten.