Girl bits
That's how I like to call them generally, though in my view it looks more like a carcrash.
With the ever more popular use of the word cunt instead of sub or slave you can't help being reminded of it a lot. On places like fetlife you see quite a few, some have rings in them and practically 99% of them are shaved. And about 85% of those look horrid due to nasty bumps and razorburn, trust me they would have looked and felt better with hair. I guess it's just one of those painful subby sacrifices.
How many daily shavings per infraction, Sir?
Myeah I've never seen that one requested. Just for aesthetic and mythical hygiene reasons. You'd think at least the sadists would have discovered this lovely means of having your sub think about you any time she sits down or even sleeps right? Oow pussy fire 24/7, why is that not sexy?
In threads about the shaving there are always the few females who seem to think every complaining female is overreacting and that it is just not a big deal. I think those women just have very straight growing sparse hairs because that place just doesn't like shaving. Most people have hair that curls there so the inset is slanting, which makes ingrown hair practically a given even when you pull it out at the root like with waxing or sugaring.
Also, your period goes all over the place without the hair. Which is unhandy to say the least. Maybe I have rather sensitive girly bits too but well for me it all feels better with some protection of the fur, I don't want to have to sit down too carefully in case a seam in my pants or panties rubs. It's not the sexy type wedgy you see in anime.
It doesn't smell bad with fur either, at least not for me. That whole hygiene idea of a shaven pussy might be for those people who only bathe once every few days? Or they have unprotected sex and the rotting sperm gets caught or something? But you'd kind of have to have a real serious long '70 bush for that I think.
Those '70 porn women must have been selected for the length of their hippiebush. How many women are naturally able to grow such a jungle? We are not all Demi Moore after all. But it's hard to tell because the pics these days are all shaven and waxed. Argh, can you imagine how much pain Demi must have gone trough before laser?
But even then, she didn't look "dirty" at all I think. Would a man really see that and run for the hills? As opposed to this. That just looks so irritated and painfull, while she would probably look very pretty with some hair.
And even for oral, a little trim would get stuff out of the way right? He's not trying to floss with the stuff so ehm how much does he get in his teeth? Is he scraping the area!?
Anyways the whole reason I thought about posting was because of the labia thing. Without the hair it's all about that now. You can't hide a thing. In porn women are selected for how neat things look down there so little labia is what most women get to see other females have. By definition they are going to think they are grossly misshapen and colored strangely.
Plastic surgery is now the in thing to do. It can make you look like that. Which is really freaky to me. I'm not a fan of carcrash-pussies but that one looks like someone took a 7 year old and put in a piercing. Eek. Then again she may be the only girl who can wear a thong and not have it ride up into anything because there is simply nothing there.
BTW, why thongs? If you are wearing something really tight you can wear the seamless things or nothing. For a sexy hey see my butt thing I can understand too but for everyday wear? It just seems ridiculously anatomically incorrect. I am not a pussy expert but most women are wider down there than the part of a thing that is suposed to be covering your vaginal opening right? So...eternal pussywedgy?
Hell, without hair almost anything except grannypanties from strong thick cotton will ride up in there.
But to get back on toppic. Pussies without hair almost always look odd, nature didn't design it to look pretty, it designed it too be able to stretch and keep bugs out. In porn pics they tend to be stretched open (maybe from lots of use) but those inner labia are usually pretty good at keeping together. Some do look better with some surgery though, I was looking at a page and I'm suddenly thinking mine doesn't look all that bad at all. Well, compared to these (no eating while clicking that link).
I understand them taking the trip to the surgeon though most seem to do it because they get discomfort from sitting or with sex. I saw them do one of the more crude resections on tv once, OMG. The girl was actually cut with big scissors, he just took the innerlabia, pulled them out and snipped. This was not in a African country btw, it was England. Though I think he was doing it more primitively than other plastic surgeons would.
I imagine it would be a bit like a guy having snipped a strip of his ballsack skin or something. You must really hate your bits a lot to be able to take that step once you saw that surgery happen. *shudder* The girl was bleeding a lot and all though she could go home almost right away she was really suffering, the whole area was swollen and she had to sit on ice.
Aside from preventing discomfort from hairemoval and chafing or aesthetic complaints pubes are also rather interesting. I had a friend who was sending me heaps of naked girl pics and with his preference for redheads and Asian girls the pubes were always more fun. Every girl has different colors and way it grows, how is that not fascinating to men?
While the naked even without razorburn tends to look like something the butcher would send out to be made into dogfood frankly. It's easy to accept the look after a while of getting used to, so is the hair look btw but I do feel that unlike legs or armpits a pussy doesn't look "better" shaved. Even the claim it makes things feel more sensitive would probably be negated after having your panties rub against it for a few months (pussycalouses? hehe)
I'm a bit tricky with the armpit hair though. Technically it is as unnatural as shaving a pussy. I tend to like it when someone has little hair there naturally. In girls I think it can be as interesting as the downstairs version and in men well I find it rather sexy. Not on huge big black bushy haired guys, but the blondish suntanned types who just have a bit under the arms too. Then seeing it when they stretch or something...yumm. Weird.
I'm pretty sure bodyhair culture will soon turn away from the totally bare look though. We are always looking for the next new exiting thing and frankly porn has been naked for too long now, it's not new anymore. It has to be dirty and as oposed to before I guess dirty now would mean bush.
Yay for the future.
~Iflie
With the ever more popular use of the word cunt instead of sub or slave you can't help being reminded of it a lot. On places like fetlife you see quite a few, some have rings in them and practically 99% of them are shaved. And about 85% of those look horrid due to nasty bumps and razorburn, trust me they would have looked and felt better with hair. I guess it's just one of those painful subby sacrifices.
How many daily shavings per infraction, Sir?
Myeah I've never seen that one requested. Just for aesthetic and mythical hygiene reasons. You'd think at least the sadists would have discovered this lovely means of having your sub think about you any time she sits down or even sleeps right? Oow pussy fire 24/7, why is that not sexy?
In threads about the shaving there are always the few females who seem to think every complaining female is overreacting and that it is just not a big deal. I think those women just have very straight growing sparse hairs because that place just doesn't like shaving. Most people have hair that curls there so the inset is slanting, which makes ingrown hair practically a given even when you pull it out at the root like with waxing or sugaring.
Also, your period goes all over the place without the hair. Which is unhandy to say the least. Maybe I have rather sensitive girly bits too but well for me it all feels better with some protection of the fur, I don't want to have to sit down too carefully in case a seam in my pants or panties rubs. It's not the sexy type wedgy you see in anime.
It doesn't smell bad with fur either, at least not for me. That whole hygiene idea of a shaven pussy might be for those people who only bathe once every few days? Or they have unprotected sex and the rotting sperm gets caught or something? But you'd kind of have to have a real serious long '70 bush for that I think.
Those '70 porn women must have been selected for the length of their hippiebush. How many women are naturally able to grow such a jungle? We are not all Demi Moore after all. But it's hard to tell because the pics these days are all shaven and waxed. Argh, can you imagine how much pain Demi must have gone trough before laser?
But even then, she didn't look "dirty" at all I think. Would a man really see that and run for the hills? As opposed to this. That just looks so irritated and painfull, while she would probably look very pretty with some hair.
And even for oral, a little trim would get stuff out of the way right? He's not trying to floss with the stuff so ehm how much does he get in his teeth? Is he scraping the area!?
Anyways the whole reason I thought about posting was because of the labia thing. Without the hair it's all about that now. You can't hide a thing. In porn women are selected for how neat things look down there so little labia is what most women get to see other females have. By definition they are going to think they are grossly misshapen and colored strangely.
Plastic surgery is now the in thing to do. It can make you look like that. Which is really freaky to me. I'm not a fan of carcrash-pussies but that one looks like someone took a 7 year old and put in a piercing. Eek. Then again she may be the only girl who can wear a thong and not have it ride up into anything because there is simply nothing there.
BTW, why thongs? If you are wearing something really tight you can wear the seamless things or nothing. For a sexy hey see my butt thing I can understand too but for everyday wear? It just seems ridiculously anatomically incorrect. I am not a pussy expert but most women are wider down there than the part of a thing that is suposed to be covering your vaginal opening right? So...eternal pussywedgy?
Hell, without hair almost anything except grannypanties from strong thick cotton will ride up in there.
But to get back on toppic. Pussies without hair almost always look odd, nature didn't design it to look pretty, it designed it too be able to stretch and keep bugs out. In porn pics they tend to be stretched open (maybe from lots of use) but those inner labia are usually pretty good at keeping together. Some do look better with some surgery though, I was looking at a page and I'm suddenly thinking mine doesn't look all that bad at all. Well, compared to these (no eating while clicking that link).
I understand them taking the trip to the surgeon though most seem to do it because they get discomfort from sitting or with sex. I saw them do one of the more crude resections on tv once, OMG. The girl was actually cut with big scissors, he just took the innerlabia, pulled them out and snipped. This was not in a African country btw, it was England. Though I think he was doing it more primitively than other plastic surgeons would.
I imagine it would be a bit like a guy having snipped a strip of his ballsack skin or something. You must really hate your bits a lot to be able to take that step once you saw that surgery happen. *shudder* The girl was bleeding a lot and all though she could go home almost right away she was really suffering, the whole area was swollen and she had to sit on ice.
Aside from preventing discomfort from hairemoval and chafing or aesthetic complaints pubes are also rather interesting. I had a friend who was sending me heaps of naked girl pics and with his preference for redheads and Asian girls the pubes were always more fun. Every girl has different colors and way it grows, how is that not fascinating to men?
While the naked even without razorburn tends to look like something the butcher would send out to be made into dogfood frankly. It's easy to accept the look after a while of getting used to, so is the hair look btw but I do feel that unlike legs or armpits a pussy doesn't look "better" shaved. Even the claim it makes things feel more sensitive would probably be negated after having your panties rub against it for a few months (pussycalouses? hehe)
I'm a bit tricky with the armpit hair though. Technically it is as unnatural as shaving a pussy. I tend to like it when someone has little hair there naturally. In girls I think it can be as interesting as the downstairs version and in men well I find it rather sexy. Not on huge big black bushy haired guys, but the blondish suntanned types who just have a bit under the arms too. Then seeing it when they stretch or something...yumm. Weird.
I'm pretty sure bodyhair culture will soon turn away from the totally bare look though. We are always looking for the next new exiting thing and frankly porn has been naked for too long now, it's not new anymore. It has to be dirty and as oposed to before I guess dirty now would mean bush.
Yay for the future.
~Iflie