Excerpt from GENE515

Feb 08, 2006 12:41

This partly answers a question asked of me when I was 21 years old, by my doctoral thesis advisor Oliver G. Selfridge. When I say "Man" I am echoing and older text, and not excluding Woman.

Excerpt from GENE515What is Man, that he may know Number? What is Number that it may be known by Man ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Creationist skeptical about "God is a Physicist" magicdragon2 February 10 2006, 19:16:38 UTC
Don Batten, a Creationist, has a different slant on this.

Physicists' God-talk by Don Batten"... Some well-known physicists in recent times have used language which, to many Christians, sounds as if these men have some sort of Christian faith, or are leaning in that direction. Some Christian people have thus been encouraged. Some writers in Christian magazines have encouraged this belief that the physicists are getting 'closer to God', even claiming that what they say authenticates the Bible. [For example, Hugh Ross, 'Cosmology's Holy Grail', Christianity Today, December 12, 1994, pp. 24-7 ( ... )

Reply

Smite, Smoot; Re: Creationist skeptical magicdragon2 March 3 2006, 04:49:34 UTC
George Smoot is not to be confused with U.S. Senator from Utah named Reed Owen Smoot (1862-1941), who is best known for a strongly protectionist tariff, the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930; and for a fight against pornography, which led to the classic headline in many newspapers, "Smoot Smites Smut", and the verse [excerpt below]:

Ogden Nash (Invocation)

Senator Smoot is an institute

Not to be bribed with pelf;

He guards our homes from erotic tomes

By reading them all himself.

Smite, Smoot, smite for Ut.,

They're smuggling smut from Balt. to Butte!

Strongest and sternest

Of your s_x

Scatter the scoundrels

From Can. to Mex!

Reply

Galileo; Re: Creationist skeptical magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 03:46:47 UTC

I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.

-- Galileo Galilei

Reply

Galileo was no idiot magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 04:02:24 UTC

Galileo was no idiot.

Only an idiot could believe
that science requires martyrdom --
that may be necessary in religion,
but in time
a scientific result
will establish itself.

-- David Hilbert, (1862-1943) In H. Eves, Mathematical Circles Squared, Boston: Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, 1971.

Reply

Whitehead; Re: Creationist skeptical magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 03:47:36 UTC

Religion will not reign its old power until it can face change in the same spirit as does science.

-- Alfred North Whitehead

Reply

Bertrand Russell, Re: Whitehead magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 09:17:54 UTC

"Mathematics gets its semblance of reality by never saying what it is talking about."

-- Bertrand Russell
coauthor with Whitehead of Principia Mathematica.

Reply

Whitehead: more important interesting than true magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 09:28:05 UTC

"It is more important
that a proposition be interesting
than that it be true.

This statement is almost a tautology.

For the energy of operation of a proposition
in an occasion of experience is its interest
and is its importance.

But of course a true proposition
is more apt to be interesting
than a false one."

-- Alfred North Whitehead, W.H. Auden and L. Kronenberger The Viking Book of Aphorisms, New York: Viking Press, 1966.

Reply

Martin Gardner; Re: Creationist skeptical magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 03:48:52 UTC

It is sad to find him belaboring the science community for its united opposition to ignorant creationists who want teachers and textbooks to give equal time to crank arguments that have advanced not a step beyond the flyblown rhetoric of Bishop Wilberforce and William Jennings Bryan.

-- Martin Gardner

Reply

Nobody since Newton; Whewell & "consilience", part 1 magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 05:43:30 UTC

Nobody since Newton
has been able to use
geometrical methods
to the same extent
for the like purposes;

and as we read the Principia
we feel as when we are
in an ancient armoury
where the weapons are
of gigantic size;

and as we look at them
we marvel
what manner of man
he was
who could use
as a weapon
what we
can scarcely lift
as a burden.

-- William Whewell [see below]
in E. N. Da C. Andrade "Isaac Newton"
in J. R. Newman (ed.) The World of Mathematics,
New York: Simon and Schuster, 1956.

====

William Whewell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
William Whewell (May 24, 1794 - March 6, 1866) was a scientist, Anglican priest, philosopher, theologian, natural theologian and historian of science. His surname is pronounced "Hughell ( ... )

Reply

Whewell & "consilience", part 2 magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 05:45:06 UTC
He analyses induction into three steps ( ... )

Reply

Whewell & "consilience", part 3 magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 05:47:04 UTC
Between 1835 and 1861 Whewell produced various works on the philosophy of morals and politics, the chief of which, Elements of Morality, including Polity, was published in 1845. The peculiarity of this work--written, of course, from what is known as the intuitional point of view--is its fivefold division of the springs of action and of their objects, of the primary and universal rights of man (personal security, property, contract, family rights and government), and of the cardinal virtues (benevolence, justice, truth, purity and order). Among Whewell's other works--too numerous to mention--were popular writings such as the 3rd Bridgewater Treatise Astronomy and General Physics considered with reference to Natural Theology (1833), and the essay, Of the Plurality of Worlds (1854), in which he argued against the probability of planetary life, and also to the Platonic Dialogues for English Readers (1850-1861), to the Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy in England (1852), to the essay, Of a Liberal Education in General, with ( ... )

Reply

Newton: as a monster he was superb magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 07:01:57 UTC

If we evolved
a race of Isaac Newtons,
that would not
be progress.

For the price
Newton had to pay
for being a supreme intellect
was that he was incapable
of friendship, love, fatherhood,
and many other
desirable things.

As a man he was a failure;
as a monster he was superb.

-- Aldous Huxley, Interview with J. W. N. Sullivan,
Contemporary Mind, London, 1934.

Reply

Newton: I recognize the lion by his paw magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 07:11:25 UTC

I recognize the lion by his paw.

-- Jacques Bernoulli, Jacques (1654-1705)
[After reading an anonymous solution to a problem
that he realized was Newton's solution.]
in G. Simmons, Calculus Gems, New York: McGraw Hill, 1992, p. 136.

Man with a Golden Paw
"It is not unthinkable that the paw, or claw, may be an obscure reference to some Latin phrase which, in this context, would have the force of a motto. The motto might be
'ex ungue leonem' (to recognize 'the lion by its paw'), a synechoche employed by Classical writers, for example Plutarch and Lucian, to refer - by metonymy - to a painter's brushwork or signature, or 'hand' in sculpture, which immediately identifies the work of a particular master. This interpretation of the paw would, of course, be in keeping with the suggestion that it represents a professional attribute."

Reply

Bourbaki, re: Newton and geometry as a Weapon magicdragon2 March 4 2006, 10:03:08 UTC

"Structures are the weapons of the mathematician."

-- Bourbaki.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up