(no subject)
Well done, Iowa.
I'm really cranky today, sorry if I bite :E
but seeing that made me feel better, at least until I got to the point about the organization opposing the ruling. I can't tell you how headachingly angry it makes me to see the complete lack of reasonable argument from these people. Even if you do want to assert that marriage is a religious institution, then you have to realize that A) MARRIAGE EXISTED BEFORE CHRIST and B) if you want marriage to be beholden to religious values, then it SHOULD NOT BE SUPPORTED BY THE GOVERNMENT AT ANY LEVEL, unless such values are not LIMITED to the King James interpretation.
arrgh so young, so angry
I'm really cranky today, sorry if I bite :E
but seeing that made me feel better, at least until I got to the point about the organization opposing the ruling. I can't tell you how headachingly angry it makes me to see the complete lack of reasonable argument from these people. Even if you do want to assert that marriage is a religious institution, then you have to realize that A) MARRIAGE EXISTED BEFORE CHRIST and B) if you want marriage to be beholden to religious values, then it SHOULD NOT BE SUPPORTED BY THE GOVERNMENT AT ANY LEVEL, unless such values are not LIMITED to the King James interpretation.
arrgh so young, so angry