See my baby walking down the street, I see red, I see red, I see red

Mar 08, 2011 22:27

The cable (the ever-so-nifty Apple® cable that only Apple manufacture (and because they're the only ones, do it at a rather steep price) because their computers are the only ones with this absolutely brilliant video out port while all the other laptops are stuck in the dark ages with a so-standard-it-hurts VGA out port that almost any monitor can ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

lustforlike March 23 2011, 03:19:43 UTC
The same thing would indeed happen in other colours, I can be certain enough of that that I don't need to wreck another cable trying the experiment. ;) Although, there's probably a software solution for that too.

And yes, colour and the brain is fascinating. They did an experiment where they gave people tinted glasses - for example, yellow-tinted glasses, so everything looked yellow. The guinea pigs reported that the first day everything was yellow, but by the second day everything was normal (bear in mind that for this experiment to work they have to never take off the glasses). Then they took the glasses off, and everything was tinted blue! Complementary colours and all, and showing just what the brain was doing to compensate for the glasses! Clever little mound of noodles, it is.

Having said that, the cable died completely last week, so I spent several days with no computer, then my girlfriend found a cheap cable online for about a sixth the price of the one at the Apple store. Also, it works perfectly. I want to know how someone can make something like that and make a profit and yet Apple has to charge through the nose for it.

Reply

cozzybob March 24 2011, 23:52:35 UTC
Heee! Well you know me, I'd probably wreck the cable trying to experiment and then live to regret it afterwards. You're the smarter one. xD

Clever little mound of noodles, it is.

That made me LOL! But so true, and a very fascinating study! We have little hue/saturation sliders in our brains. Who knew?

I want to know how someone can make something like that and make a profit and yet Apple has to charge through the nose for it.

Wow, yeah I'd want to know as well! It's the one thing I've noticed about Apple, that they're rather expensive on a lot of things, and I'm not really sure where they justify it. Of course, I say that being an opensource hog at this point. I'll probably never go back, now. xD

Reply

lustforlike March 25 2011, 03:52:20 UTC
I think I typed a Chinese space or something by accident, it won't let me post my reply! Long story short: I want to go Linux too, and will do when I get a new computer. I'll miss a lot of things, mostly iTunes/Address Book/iPod automatic synching, and especially Garageband and iMovie, but hey, things change.

Reply

cozzybob March 25 2011, 04:05:39 UTC
Ah! But there's a lot of programs for free in the packages that can do all that, so I wouldn't worry too much. If you like Mac look and toys, I use OpenSuse and the KDE desktop (OpenSuse has the best KDE support, from what I've seen). Also, it's absolutely gorgeous (no, really) and there are soooooooo many toys (and the desktop effects, omg). In Amarok, you can sync most iPod types, and there's kaddressbook, ect. I don't think iTunes itself works on most linux OS's, but you'll have to check that out for yourself, and there might even be some sort of alternative. Knowing the community, there's probably someone out there who's at least given it a try in Wine!

Of course, there's also Gnome, and I hear they recently got a big update with graphics as well. If you go Ubuntu, you're probably better with the Gnome desktop--but these days, I'm really happy with Suse & KDE. Go check out the types, ect, and pick one: http://distrowatch.com/

/fangirling. ^^

Reply

lustforlike March 25 2011, 08:16:23 UTC
To be honest, I don't care much about the graphical effects. That's for games, not desktops. Last time I ran Linux I ran IceWM half the time. ;)

Most desktop environments these days (and this includes Mac OS X, despite the improvements they've made) are actually pretty pathetic at what they're supposed to do. They're stuck using technology from ten or twenty years ago, only prettier. Why is it, for example, that no windowing environment I know of has an automatic way of grouping windows by task? Most can now group windows by application (Mac OS does this out of the box, welcome to the party Windows but you're still a bit behind, and I'm sure the Linux desktops can do it but I don't know what their solution is), but the best anyone's come up with for task groups is multiple desktops, and that's a hack and a half. You have to manually set up which applications should go in which desktops, and they have an annoying habit of forgetting, especially if one application has windows on more than one desktop (this goes for Window, Linux and Mac). This is basic functionality, yet it constantly gets shafted in favour of the next shiny thing. Linux is admittedly a better breeding group for ideas - no-one loses profit margins if an experiment doesn't work - but there are precious few experiments even there, as they all try to play catch-up to the commercial desktops and prove that Linux isn't ugly. Cool, it's not ugly. Now bring functionality back. :D

Lack of iTunes on Linux will grieve me, but not kill me. Best damn music management software out there. The little things, though, will:
  • Foreign language input methods
  • Hardware installation (much better these days, but the tablet... how easy was it for you?)
  • Garageband (nothing in the free or even the same price range as it comes close)
  • Artrage, Photoshop (even if Photoshop works, it works because of Wine, and I have a Mac copy of Photoshop)
  • XCode (Linux is overall better for development, but easy-to-use development tools that are also industrial-strength?)

Still, I'll live, and find new tools. What I really want, of course, as hinted above, is for someone to do things even better than Mac OS. It can and should be done.

Reply

cozzybob March 25 2011, 04:07:38 UTC
Oh, and I'm not sure about an alternative to iMovie--that's one thing I actually *haven't* been happy with, support for movie programs, because most of the linux versions I've tried haven't been very good, sadly. This is also why I have Windows, though. I hate Adobe, but dammit, they make good programs. xD

Reply

lustforlike March 25 2011, 08:18:44 UTC
Yeah, that kind of program needs money to make. iMovie is strictly consumer-level, but like Garageband it kicks an amazing amount of arse for software bundled with the OS (Garageband actually kicks more arse, that category of program, in fact the exact same program, my dad would pay hundred of dollars for alone back in the day, until Apple bought them out and they discontinued support for Windows).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up