back on top

Aug 04, 2011 07:30

I felt bad that my fic bumped ESS down the page.

So here:


Read more... )

eric sheffer stevens, pictures

Leave a comment

moerlin August 4 2011, 13:20:52 UTC
Okay, I give up. I've been trying to post HQ versions of these pics for 20 minutes and whatever I do, it always ends up being sent to the screening queue.

Last attempt, without any direct links whatsoever (copy/paste manually, please)
Waist-and-up shot: img15.imageshack.us/img15/7296/ih02eric0190rc.jpg
Full body shot: img8.imageshack.us/img8/1644/ih02eric0111ly.jpg

NGL, his expression on the full body shot made me LOL. ;)

Reply

dpracket August 4 2011, 13:25:28 UTC
Oh, holy cow. Those are definitely HIGH RES files! :D

Reply

moerlin August 4 2011, 13:32:16 UTC
It's nice to have something new to drool over, right? :D

Reply

dpracket August 4 2011, 14:08:23 UTC
HD scruff. And he has some gray whiskers, which to me is just...yeah, well. I like it.

I'm almost embarrassed at how close in you can zoom. Almost. Lol. Lovin' the Ctrl+ view. Haha...

Reply

moerlin August 4 2011, 14:16:38 UTC
Hee!

Yeah, it is really close. Just wait until the whole 3D pictures thing takes off, and then it'll really be like he's standing right in front of you. ;)

Reply

tldreamer August 4 2011, 23:42:24 UTC
Delish! I'm have to put on a bib, I'm drooling so much over the close-ups! Thanks for the links!

Reply

thefigtree August 4 2011, 13:44:03 UTC
Boo for LJ being lame. Thanks for these nice shots, though! I feel like I could reach out and touch him. :D

Reply

moerlin August 4 2011, 14:15:00 UTC
Ah, if only we really could. :D Although I gotta agree with dpracket, it is kinda creepy that they're larger than life-sized... but oh well, I guess that's part of the reason why they give them the Photoshop treatment before releasing them.

Reply

pghbekka August 4 2011, 16:30:19 UTC
Yeah, I mean, sure the man's gorgeous, love looking at him, but I could see his PORES! Not an intimacy I usually have with people outside of immediate family.

Reply

dpracket August 4 2011, 18:09:41 UTC
I know...it's a little too up close and personal. :D

Reply

moerlin August 4 2011, 23:39:44 UTC
Yeah, it's definitely... something else. But no wonder when they used this 60(!) megapixel "camera" (digital back, anyway) for the photoshoot. This also means that the originals are twice as large, even. Not sure I'd even want to see those. ;)

Reply

ltklo August 4 2011, 23:06:23 UTC
Thanks, my dear. Zooming in on the half-body shot makes him almost life-sized :)

Reply

moerlin August 5 2011, 00:01:36 UTC
It really does. And oh man, now this is totally giving me flashbacks to my early teens, when they still had those life-sized posters of celebrities in teen magazines that you had to collect over the course of like 20 weeks and then glue together. (Only I wasn't ever obsessed enough with anyone to do that back then. :D))

Reply

ltklo August 5 2011, 11:39:24 UTC
Ah, the old teen mags where we found out their fav foods, fav places to visit. The internet is so much more convenient but back then every nugget of info was valuable :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up