[ XXXVIII | Audio ]

Mar 28, 2010 17:57

[ His communicator loves him. Really, it does. Recording him trying to make out what the hell one of the philosophy books he has means. ]

If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? Wouldn't it make a sound regardless of who was there to... Doesn't this book ask any worthwhile questions? Geeze...

philosophy time, psychology time, koizumi, these books are dumb

Leave a comment

kan_chyan March 28 2010, 22:03:51 UTC
You're suppose to think on the question and meditate with it. Ask other questions like "Is there sound if no one is there to hear it?" you can even go so far as to say "is it even fallen without someone there to see it?". Like the questions "What is the sound of one hand clapping" and "Who am I?".

Reply

lunchpenalty March 28 2010, 23:12:56 UTC
[ Gdit, communicator. ]

But isn't it obvious that it would make a sound?

Reply

kan_chyan March 29 2010, 00:13:58 UTC
Is it obvious? If you're not there to observe it, did it happen? Does it exist? Or, does it only happen when there are ears and eyes to experience it? A tree already fallen, did it fall? Or was it always like that to begin with?

You can't think scientifically for these questions.

Reply

lunchpenalty March 29 2010, 02:18:58 UTC
So put a tape recorder in the forest and record it. If it makes a sound when someone is there, it will make a sound if no one is anywhere near it. Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Reply

kan_chyan March 29 2010, 02:23:15 UTC
You're missing the entire point. As I said, it's a meditative question. To make you think about the world around you and perceive it in different ways.

Reply

lunchpenalty March 29 2010, 06:34:57 UTC
But if there's no definite answer, then...?

Reply

If only he could reference Schrodinger's Cat. Too bad it happend in 1935. kan_chyan March 29 2010, 06:39:54 UTC
That's it. You just, think on it, discuss it, meditate on it. There is no definite answer, because every answer you can think of for it, or anyone can think of for it, is valid for the purpose of it's use.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up