(Untitled)

Mar 13, 2005 13:43



Just because.

Leave a comment

pk_maximoo March 13 2005, 12:51:30 UTC
You dream about me giving you a blowjob, but the 15 women around us make you limp?

Oh dear.

Reply

luckz March 13 2005, 14:23:55 UTC
Maybe I orgasmed, that lead to limpness, and then all the oral licked me dry?

Reply

pk_maximoo March 13 2005, 14:50:41 UTC
That also makes sense.

Reply

luckz March 13 2005, 14:53:56 UTC
Does not really do so, because it would require females being attracted to me in a reality-like situation. Was just trying to find some alternate, if not quite possible, other explanation.

Reply

pk_maximoo March 13 2005, 14:55:53 UTC
*stabs luckz with the fact that Sasja referred to him as hot.*

The me-giving-you-oral bit is probably less likely than the women.

Reply

luckz March 13 2005, 15:16:04 UTC
That's what I'm trying to evade with the 'reality-like situation'. Contrary to semi-popular opinion, I do not have a girlfriend and I have never had one.

Experience shows that the number of bovines and the number of women who gave me oral are, uh, both not big.

Reply

pk_maximoo March 13 2005, 15:18:07 UTC
Experience shows that the number of women who give this bovine oral is also a very round number.

And I suppose reality-like-ness does count out online-people.

Reply

luckz March 13 2005, 15:21:58 UTC
There are, though, as previously mentioned, women who, in reality, engage in lips-to-bovine things. My face and torso are completely untouched, seen that way. By females, males, bovines, hermaphrodites, transsexuals and everybody else.

Reply

pk_maximoo March 13 2005, 16:00:59 UTC
There's only two who have engaged in mouth-to-bovine-mouth activity. Only one who did any more. The other kissed me once, as she was getting on a train to go home, and was completely unexpected. And "kissed me" is the accurate way to put it. I do not believe any chance was given for mutual participation...
Perhaps two more (non-family, natch) have kissed bovine cheek. Nothing meant by it though.

The entire point of that essay above was to point out that you're not that much worse off...

Reply

luckz March 13 2005, 16:52:52 UTC
There's a very huge difference between "zero girls" and "more than one girl", in numbers. A infinite % difference, even. A yes/no or 0/1-ish difference. Kissed and unkissed are opposites.
And I may have cheek-kissed a multitude of people, including but not limited to family, but that mostly happened in France, and there it is more or less required. I cheek-kissed girls I never saw before and never saw again. I claim those do not count, the "nothing meant" thing you mentioned.

Reply

pk_maximoo March 13 2005, 16:55:57 UTC
Cheek-kissing is not a common thing amongst those I socialise with, generally.

And yeah, I suppose they are opposites. However. You're younger than when I was first kissed, I believe, no?

Reply

iron_pineapple March 13 2005, 17:01:36 UTC
Guys, guys - as fascinating as this competitive chastity undoubtedly is, would the two of you please just stop whining and shut up!

:P

xx

Reply

luckz March 13 2005, 17:55:18 UTC
I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave.

Reply

pk_maximoo March 13 2005, 18:03:22 UTC
Since you got involved in the conversation, hun, I think I shall have to ask for when you first got kissed.

Reply

luckz March 13 2005, 19:30:08 UTC
I second and third this.

Reply

iron_pineapple March 14 2005, 14:49:23 UTC
And i think i shall have to ignore you.
xx

Reply


Leave a comment

Up