(no subject)
x-post из chomsky_ru
Вот некоторые интересные работы по корейской грамматике автора James H.-S. Yoon:
Например:
Process nominals and morphological complexity (2004) Paper argues that recent attempts to restrict argument-bearing nominals to deverbal nominals are too restrictive, and that J/K verbal nouns are argument-bearing. Paper based on invited presentation, 13th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference, Michigan State University, co-authored with Chongwon Park.In M. Endo-Hudson and P. Sells eds., Japanese-Korean Linguistics 13, CSLI Publications, Stanford University.
Dual Lexical Categories and Inflectional Morphology (2002) Paper argues that the morphosyntactic mismatches found in mixed categories and those in inflected categories are the same. Explores the implications for theories of morphosyntactic mismatches; In P. Sells & O. Orgun eds., Morphology and the Web of Grammar: Essays in memory of Steve G. Lapointe, 139-168, CSLI Publications.
Raising of Major Arguments in Korean and Japanese (2007) Paper argues that Subject-to-Object Raising in Korean (and Japanese) targets embedded Major Subjects. The Major Subject raising analysis is compared to a base-generation (Prolepsis, Major Object) analysis and shown to be superior. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25:3, pp. 615-653 (Also in Bill Davies and Stan Dubinsky (2007) eds., New Horizons in the Analysis of Raising and Control, Springer Verlag, pp. 71-107).
What the Korean copula reveals about the interaction of morphology and syntax
(2002) Paper based on keynote presentation, 11th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference, UCSB; In Japanese-Korean Linguistics 11, edited by Pat Clancy, CSLI Publications, pp. 34-50.
Более подробно см. http://www.linguistics.uiuc.edu/jyoon/Papers.htm . Есть ли у кого-нибудь ссылки по этим темам?
Вот некоторые интересные работы по корейской грамматике автора James H.-S. Yoon:
Например:
Process nominals and morphological complexity (2004) Paper argues that recent attempts to restrict argument-bearing nominals to deverbal nominals are too restrictive, and that J/K verbal nouns are argument-bearing. Paper based on invited presentation, 13th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference, Michigan State University, co-authored with Chongwon Park.In M. Endo-Hudson and P. Sells eds., Japanese-Korean Linguistics 13, CSLI Publications, Stanford University.
Dual Lexical Categories and Inflectional Morphology (2002) Paper argues that the morphosyntactic mismatches found in mixed categories and those in inflected categories are the same. Explores the implications for theories of morphosyntactic mismatches; In P. Sells & O. Orgun eds., Morphology and the Web of Grammar: Essays in memory of Steve G. Lapointe, 139-168, CSLI Publications.
Raising of Major Arguments in Korean and Japanese (2007) Paper argues that Subject-to-Object Raising in Korean (and Japanese) targets embedded Major Subjects. The Major Subject raising analysis is compared to a base-generation (Prolepsis, Major Object) analysis and shown to be superior. In Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25:3, pp. 615-653 (Also in Bill Davies and Stan Dubinsky (2007) eds., New Horizons in the Analysis of Raising and Control, Springer Verlag, pp. 71-107).
What the Korean copula reveals about the interaction of morphology and syntax
(2002) Paper based on keynote presentation, 11th Japanese-Korean Linguistics Conference, UCSB; In Japanese-Korean Linguistics 11, edited by Pat Clancy, CSLI Publications, pp. 34-50.
Более подробно см. http://www.linguistics.uiuc.edu/jyoon/Papers.htm . Есть ли у кого-нибудь ссылки по этим темам?