[Locked from Vincent, Kadaj, Sephiroth, Angeal and Yuri | 81% Unhackable]

Dec 15, 2009 15:57

[Text]Someone mentioned something that brought something to mind. Once I saw a drama. The main character was a kyuubi and she had a very good friend. My memory is a little bad on everything that happened, but her friend was hurt by someone and dying. The kyuubi used her magic, but the friend was hurt too badly. To save the friend, the kyuubi placed ( Read more... )

roundabout questions, curiosity is bad for your health, master of subtlety, ic, i tell you this idea was brilliant, discedo

Leave a comment

[voice; 99% lock] lol they have more in common than I thought, except this one was more of an ass pagesniffer December 15 2009, 23:26:16 UTC
[he follows the discussion as it moves along, interested to see what the people here will make of it; then adds his own voice]

I assume the monster was the only one available that would do, and she knew well the consequences of her actions?

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] Ffff I never even thought of that lovelyscientist December 15 2009, 23:40:15 UTC
Yes. Does that make a difference?

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] and, well, he performed the opposite action! divided into two monsters ololol pagesniffer December 15 2009, 23:44:56 UTC
It does. Both in her ability to deal with the aftermath, and the amount of blame available.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] And yet she would completely get why he did it lovelyscientist December 15 2009, 23:51:00 UTC
And your thoughts on those?

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] it was FOR SCIENCE :Db ... and he ended his world on top of that hahaha what pagesniffer December 15 2009, 23:55:46 UTC
If she knew what she was dealing with, she should have been prepared to deal with the consequences.

The blame game, on the other hand, rests on several things. Did the world end?

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] Yes science! Though that last part, not so cool |D lovelyscientist December 16 2009, 00:00:48 UTC
What? No! ...It ah, wasn't that sort of drama.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] ah, well, can't help the collateral damage pagesniffer December 16 2009, 00:20:16 UTC
[he sounds faintly amused] Quite a waste of a good plot point.

Then the other things we must consider: what was her friend's opinion? And if the monster did not end the world, what, ultimately, did it do instead?

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] lovelyscientist December 16 2009, 00:29:29 UTC
M-maybe. [Right now she is regretting saying tv drama instead of "so I had this friend once...">]

Um...I think... It's been awhile. But if I remember correctly he blamed the man that had hurt him for everything. I don't believe he liked being a monster though.

As for the monster... Besides gaining control of the man's body from time to time, nothing I believe.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] pagesniffer December 16 2009, 00:38:44 UTC
It seems, then, that though he did not enjoy the condition, he accepted becoming a monster and was not debilitated by the fact. What he is is a matter of right and wrong only according to his own actions.

A rather inconclusive ending, but that is how life is, is it not?

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] lovelyscientist December 16 2009, 00:47:12 UTC
Hm, I suppose... That is a logical stance to say the least though. I'm a bit relieved.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] pagesniffer December 16 2009, 00:55:43 UTC
Reason is certainly humanity's greatest asset, as they say. [have more amusement] I did not take you for one to lose sleep over dramas.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] lovelyscientist December 16 2009, 01:06:21 UTC
A-ah... No, no I'm not really. I'm not much of one for this...this sort of thing. It was... I had similar thoughts a bit to your own, but I was worried perhaps I was being unreasonable.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] pagesniffer December 16 2009, 18:34:35 UTC
The opinions of others are normally a poor gauge when it comes to matters of morality. You will never get a true answer, unless you merely mean to kill time.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] lovelyscientist December 17 2009, 04:02:53 UTC
There seem to be many people around here that don't think much of others' opinions.

Isn't it human nature to seek out reassurance when facts prove inconclusive? It's impossible to have a life without a single doubt.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] pagesniffer December 17 2009, 17:39:53 UTC
Perhaps. I myself believe there to be a suitable time and place for external input. Life by committee is not terribly efficient, after all.

If there are doubts, then your facts are lacking.

Reply

[voice; 99% lock] lovelyscientist December 19 2009, 00:12:29 UTC
Alright, alright! I'll rely more on my own opinions.

Is that sufficient for you?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up