The second half of LoK Book 2 did some really interesting things story-wise, including telling the story of the first Avatar and providing an ending with real consequences, one that set the stage for the next and arguably the best season of the show. There were some weaknesses in the buildup that I think undercut the conclusion, but overall I was
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
That is incidentally a good rule for gamemastering, too. It now occurs to me it's also indispensable for writing.
And, of course, the biggest battles should also reflect the themes of the story. Without any of that, the action is just sound and fury.
Maybe being the biggest and baddest dude around was the theme of Book 2? Or at least that was the only conclusion I could draw from the events of the season. I particularly remember how Vaatu said he can't be defeated by fighting because he's the embodiment of chaos and violence etc., which in fact sounded completely logical and presented an interesting story opportunity. However it turned out to be nonsense within the bounds of the story and all Korra had to do was ignore him and punch harder, which I found hilarious.
it's a matter of whether you like Chex Mix better than a chewy, fatty, overcooked steak.Oh, choices, choices. For sheer comedic value I'll have to go with Book 2 ( ... )
Reply
Of course, in "Return of the Jedi," Luke defeats both Vader and the Emperor by throwing down his lightsaber and refusing to fight, prompting Vader to turn against his master and the dark side, destroying them both.
Korra should have just taught Luke how to do Glow Punches. XD
Reply
I've got to hand it to Stover for building that bridge between the mess of the prequels to the climactic moment of the original movies. Who would have thought a "Revenge of the Sith" novel would end up working?
Reply
Leave a comment