mobil version full version Full version RU ENG

windows XP backups

Jan 03, 2012 15:46

Dear Genie,

In backing up my hard drive--data only, not my operating system or programs--onto an external drive, is there any reason to use the Windows backup utility (which generates that one big .bkf file) instead of just creating a mirror of my files? It seems individual files would be more useful because then if I accidentally delete an mp3 or ( ... )

Leave a comment

Comments (3)

kengr

kengr

I'm rather fond of Second Copy. If you don't buy it, you can't change your backup settings after the trial expires. But it's not that expensive.

I have it set to copy most stuff to a second hard drive in the early morning hours.

I use the settings that copy new & changed files but leave alone files on the backup drive that no longer exist on the main drive.

Every once in a while I manually run a different backup config that does the same as the normal config *except* it deletes files on the backup drive that no longer exist on the main drive.

That's necessary because otherwise the backup drive fills up with old stuff I don't need or want any more.

You could do the same with an external drive, but unless it's an eSATA drive, it'll be a lot slower than using an internal drive.

My backup drive is in a removable "rack", so if I \ever decided to be really paranoid, I could shut down the system and swap in a different drive then power up, so I'd have another backup that *wasn't* in the system.

Reply


ink_13

ink_13

Some kind of rsync implementation for Windows would probably be best. cwRsync looks OK.

Reply

pne

pne

I use Unison myself for the purpose.

(I sync stuff from my web sites for my computer for backup, but also from my computer to an external hard drive.)

Reply


Leave a comment