Comments | lj_policy: (без темы)

theljstaff in lj_policy

(Untitled)

Dec 19, 2007 19:16

Concerns regarding Adult Content programWe wanted to address some concerns about the program put in place last month regarding adult content. This system came about due to a variety of legal, community, and industry standards. There are no punitive measures for deciding not to participate, and is designed so that logged-in users over the age of ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

warui_ki December 20 2007, 00:40:15 UTC

Thank you for, at the very least, referencing our concerns. One thing I can suggest is removing the interest search blocks completely. If users could more easily search for racist and illegal content, they could more easily report it, thereby boosting the utility of the Adult Flagging system.

Just a suggestion. I think things are heading in a more positive direction than they were previously, so as long as you pay attention to the issues that many people have brought up, I think things will only improve.

*Edit: First page!

marta December 20 2007, 02:00:52 UTC

Right now we can't lift the search blocks completely, but it's not tied into the flagging system because the areas of need for the two aren't the same.

Thank you for the affirmative comment - we are reading and paying attention to what effects everyone and hope you'll see the result of that in the future, too.

warui_ki December 20 2007, 02:03:38 UTC

Thanks for the answer! I think by "Adult Flagging" I actually meant "Abuse Reporting," but I can see how there might still be a difference. :)

marta December 20 2007, 02:12:45 UTC

It didn't have to do with either - so whichever it was it's still true!

gunslnger December 20 2007, 03:33:05 UTC

Right now we can't lift the search blocks completely

Will it be considered for the future?

(BTW, I don't think you meant to use "can't", as you most certainly can [and should]. You just won't.)

fiddlingfrog December 20 2007, 04:41:29 UTC

There's a difference between "legally can't" and "technically can't".

gunslnger December 20 2007, 12:38:56 UTC

Even the "legally can't" is still a "won't".

newsbean December 21 2007, 00:19:15 UTC

Not really. Frankly, if they actually can't for a legal reason, they really can't. Not without actually putting the company in jeopardy. And frankly, I'd rather they keep the servers up. At some point, I would like an explanation, but at this point, I'm satisfied with "can't."

tallblue December 20 2007, 17:09:10 UTC

Does the former SUP side have this block also, if not why not?

Back to all threads