LiveJournal is currently letting a massive source of revenue go untapped -- the sale of permanent accounts. I've heard that
bradfitz doesn't like selling permanent accounts, for some reason, and while it may seem to (eventually) start sapping money from the paid userbase, it seems that not exploiting this resource isn't the wisest of ideas
(
Read more... )
Reply
Right now there are already a lot of people who bought their permanent accounts, rather than worked for them. Why would this be different.
-My opinion though is from a business standpoint, unless the price is extremely high, permanent accounts don't make sense.-
Reply
There are plenty of people with permanent accounts who bought them... in fact, I'd be willing to bet that more people purchased permanent accounts than were given them.
There's nothing special about a permanent account except that you don't have to pay for it anymore.
Reply
Reply
My point was the same as Mark's below. They're not a badge of honor, it's just a paid account that you don't have to pay for anymore.
Reply
Other people having a permanent account in no way cheapens your permanent account. You can just realize that you put in the effort and basically got $100 for whatever it cost you to volunteer or whatever.
I don't think that Permanent Accounts should be sold lightly, but perhaps on special occassions LJ should sell 50 or 100 "first come first serve". LJ's birthday, holidays... something like that.
Reply
Reply
Reply
User bio pages for denisep and bradfitz show the difference.
(In the interests of full disclosure, I have a perm account. I purchased it because I wanted to support LJ so that my friends who didn't have US$100 at the time could keep using it for free, make a contribution to a great open source project, and because I was in Australia and the payment options at the time were really difficult, so I would have rather only done it once..)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment