Seems a little meaningless to go through a form for something that's relatively easy to code, and lacks the unique icons I just copy-paste the code and either take out the style format adds in those extra tags, or add in extra tags I want the icon to be the same as the custom ones on my style.
Problem with the top option is that neither is defining width/height. It should be an easy embed, width/height tags are pretty easy to do and the dimensions are always the same.
Without them, those of us with image placeholders on get something like this:
( ... )
When I started replying, I'd misread your code and thought that it also didn't define width/height, typed the thing then saw you had put them in, kicked myself and rewrote it, while on the phone to a client, hence the gibberish, sorry...
Nah, as I said, it's the exact same code the software generates, altered to either get rid of those closing tags caused by the ljuser style, or to remove the style altogether.
>_> Maybe one of use should recode the form to work better?
For example, these are my GJ and IJ tags:
( ... )
Reply
Without them, those of us with image placeholders on get something like this:
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Reply
Nah, as I said, it's the exact same code the software generates, altered to either get rid of those closing tags caused by the ljuser style, or to remove the style altogether.
>_> Maybe one of use should recode the form to work better?
Reply
Leave a comment