Tension between bishop and count in 12th century + existence of "chaplains"

Aug 25, 2017 12:08

Hello everyone,

I'm not so much looking for answers to a question here as advice and suggestions (hope that's ok).

My situation is this :

Read more... )

1100-1199, ~religion: christianity: historical, ~government (misc), ~middle ages, ~history (misc)

Leave a comment

irreparable September 6 2017, 09:00:38 UTC
I'm going to guess that your count is based on Pons and Raymond of Tripoli, as Tripoli was the closest to an autonomous "state" in Outremer in the 12th century. As the other commenter said, though, you've got a few problems being in Outremer proper, not the least being the melting pot of religious groups and sects and religious military orders, but the importance of the king at Jerusalem really overrode everything else, be it figuratively or literally. If you wanted to keep your politics as you have, changing your location is a good way to do it, and you've got a few options there, one being Lamorie as the other commenter said, another being Cyprus, as Richard I took it from the Byzantine Empire and it was used as a staging location for the crusaders heading towards Outremer, so you've still got the diversity of nationalities and religions and politics. Cyprus was sold in 1191 to the Templars (Richard got it in 1190), and then it was sold to Guy of Lusignan after the Templars had a revolt. His brother and heir, Aimery took it over ( ... )

Reply

rosesnake September 6 2017, 11:35:32 UTC
Hi ( ... )

Reply

1/2. irreparable September 7 2017, 09:30:30 UTC
Ah righto, that makes things clearer. In this case, not changing the setting and focussing on Raymond, with there being some sort of line about how your count responds to the call of the king of Outremer, you should be okay. For the rest of it, well, mass is usually celebrated on the sabbath, confession would be when those who wished to confess desired it. What you could have as the beginning of the antagonism between duke and bishop could be a rumbling between personalities--not everyone gets along, even if a man of the cloth is supposed to be above those things. (They were just as involved in politics, if not more, than the gentry of the court). To exacerbate that, your bishop could find it un-Christian that your duke doesn't attend confession often enough, or that his court don't all attend mass on the sabbath, or any sort of thing that would stir the secular versus the church ( ... )

Reply

2/2. irreparable September 7 2017, 09:30:49 UTC
What about when the count is away from his central city (and the centre of the bishop see) ? Would somebody be delegated to accompany him when he travels (to his various vassal fiefs and to war) ? The bishop can not be expected to follow him around everywhere, can he ?
Usually the bish and a chaplain and a novice (so he was suitably attended) would go with the duke. The duke can forbid him to go, though. Up to the bish if he wants to obey that, or complain to the pope and the cardinals in Rome about what's going on (which would also add to the tension).

How much leeway would he have about that ? How much could he avoid and how much could the bishop force him to do ? I'm thinking of him going to mass in other churches whenever possible (whenever he visits a vassal fief or is in Jerusalem for exemple) and confessing to the priest/bishop/Patriarch there. Would that be allowed ?Not a lot. The church really did control the majority of life in the medieval world. Especially on crusade, as this was a holy war. The duke could definitely go ( ... )

Reply

RE: 2/2. irreparable September 7 2017, 15:30:16 UTC
Thank you for such a detailled and clear answer ! It helps a lot !

Thanks again.

Reply

syntinen_laulu September 7 2017, 13:40:14 UTC
Either way, it places the count's religious life under the control of the bishop.

No, it doesn't. A bishop's job is to manage his diocese and his centre of operations is his cathedral and chapter house; he would only ever be a guest in the secular ruler's castle. These would naturally be in the town/city. (I don't know of any medieval cathedral anywhere that was built in a castle, and I can't imagine that ever happening unless it was a prince-bishopric and the castle belonged to the bishop.) And in historical fact the Frankish cathedral of St Mary was in the town: it was destroyed in the earthquake of 1170 but some fragments of it - a tower and some doorways- are built into the present day Grand Mosque. )

The chapel in the castle would have its own priest (possibly more than one), and would not necessarily come under the authority of the bishop at all. Nor would the bishop necessarily have the right to appoint the chaplain(s).

And if a separate chaplain existed, what would his involvement be in the count's life (if any) ?His ( ... )

Reply

irreparable September 7 2017, 15:31:00 UTC
Thank you !

Reply

wulfila September 8 2017, 13:27:21 UTC
I don't know of any medieval cathedral anywhere that was built in a castle

Well, there is one medieval cathedral within a castle that I am aware of: St. Vitus Cathedral in Prague.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up