Homosexuality in Britain (5th/6th century AC): Celts, Saxons, Picts and Scots

Oct 28, 2011 11:34

I usually write a lot of arthurian stories but this time I'd love to document well myself about homosexuality and arthurian times.
The story is in 5th/6th century and the societies/cultures in the stories are: Celts, Picts, Scots, Saxons and Celts conquered by Romans. And, of course, one of the male characters is in love with another male character.
Read more... )

400s, 600s, ~homosexuality: history, uk: scotland: history, ~middle ages, uk: history: middle ages

Leave a comment

sollersuk October 29 2011, 07:16:28 UTC
Gildas on penance may be relevant:

"A presbyter or a deacon committing natural fornication or sodomy who has perviously taken the monastic vow shall do penance for three years" (details follow).

"If any monk of lower rank (does this), he shall do penance for three years, but his allowance of bread shall be increased."

In other words, no differentiation is made as to the sinfulness of the two activities. At the time British monasticism differed quite a lot from continental forms, so probably reflects Romano-British attitudes.

Note that for this period the "Romano-" bit is still important. Gildas had had a good education and in the "De Excidio" quotes Virgil frequently; his Latin is much purer than that of his contemporaries across the Channel.

Reply

lucre_noin October 29 2011, 07:47:14 UTC
What does he mean by Sodomy? I tought that the word meaning "homosexual acts" was used later.

Thank you very much : D I'm going to read Gildas <3

Reply

sollersuk October 29 2011, 08:33:43 UTC
"Sodomita" in the original. It meant then the same as it did later. The first use in English that I can trace is around 1300, when Middle English hadn't been going for long, taken from the French "sodomie", which goes back significantly earlier and derives from the Latin word. The only other possible meaning is the literal "inhabitant of the town of Sodom" which clearly is not intended here.

If you can get hold of the Phillimore edition, it's got the translation and the original. But both are available online, though from different sources.

Reply

laurose8 October 29 2011, 18:03:02 UTC
Just to clarify, for my own muddle headedness. It didn't mean anal intercourse with females as well, then?

Reply

sollersuk October 29 2011, 18:54:04 UTC
Not at the time, no. Although it's just possible as an alternative to "fornicatio naturalis". However, both the Old French and Middle English refer to homosexual activity.

Reply

laurose8 October 29 2011, 22:30:59 UTC
Thanks for explaining.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up