Hello! I have multiple questions on this one scenario, I hope that's all right :)
Setting: I am writing a piece set in the "dark ages" around the time of Geoffrey of Monmouth and Arthurian legends. In the fandom canon knowledge and treatment of diseases and injuries is more advanced than it actually was at the time. For example there is knowledge of
(
Read more... )
And in much of Europe, the situation would be unlikely. Semi-wild ponies grazed free, but horses were too valuable to be left far from the habitation. It would be like parking tanks unattended a couple of miles from base in hostile territory. They would be put out to graze nearby, and assuming that they were wearing halters of some sort, he would probably have walked back leading them a few at a time. If they weren't wearing halters already, that would be the first thing he would see to.
Reply
and as an afterthought:
I'm also unsure he HIMSELF would go fetch the horses instead of letting a stablehand do that, unless it was some covert operation bit.
Reply
Also, the bite from the mythical beast was healed using magic, so the wound is 100% closed up and free from infection, but his muscles/tendons/nerves etc. are still healing.
Thanks a lot about the information about the consequences of the fracture. I think one arm shorter than the other would be not too bad. Is there any possibility, considering the difference between actual medieval medicine and the more advanced techniques in canon, that he would still have pretty good mobility and strength if the arm was set properly?
Also, sorry about the dark ages/medieval mix-up. Just shows how bad I am at history and all that :x
Reply
Leave a comment