I'm not sure all the external costs they mention should be imposed exclusively on gasoline for motor vehicles, but still it's something to think about.
Oh please, tax dollars subsidize gas production? These guys are making this stuff up. I like how they call themselves Bi-partisan when their roots are anything but.
I keep telling myself that, but somehow it's less effective since I've never had to buy gas there. :-/ But, if I did, I'd be driving something HIGHLY fuel efficient, or something with just two wheels.
Well, I have commented before that when we marched into Bagdad, that we needed to then make them a commonwealth, turn right and look for the next oil country and annex them, then belly up to the table with the rest of OPEC and say, "Howdy, boys..."
Considering that we have more oil resources in this country than I think any middle eastern country, what good would that do? Congress would immediatly ban drilling for any of it, cause the enviromental groups would go on and on about the 'damage to the endangered desert shrew' blah blah blah.
Personally I want to see about a hundred wells sunk on either coast. With high fines for spills to keep them from spilling any. Build a bunch more refineries too, then we'd get gas back under a buck.
Perhaps they would cry about it. But, in this case we'll have to setup as a military shop, initially, and the laws are just a bit different that way. And because it'd be a commonwealth, the laws of the US would apply differently, as if at all.
Enviromental protection laws don't function the same in commonwealths. That's why alot of US Military live-fire is done on islands that belong to US commonwealths.
Hey, at least you don't have a 500 mile commute (each way) like I do! :-) At least I (usually) only drive it every other week, and the car does get 27mpg. But flying it is starting to look cheaper.
Comments 19
I'm not sure all the external costs they mention should be imposed exclusively on gasoline for motor vehicles, but still it's something to think about.
Reply
I like how they call themselves Bi-partisan when their roots are anything but.
These people are anti-technology luddites thru and thru.
http://mondediplo.com/1997/02/20luddites
was one reference easily found.
Reply
http://www.ncga.com/public_policy/letters/ 2001/ethanol/GAO.pdf
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Personally I want to see about a hundred wells sunk on either coast. With high fines for spills to keep them from spilling any. Build a bunch more refineries too, then we'd get gas back under a buck.
Reply
Enviromental protection laws don't function the same in commonwealths. That's why alot of US Military live-fire is done on islands that belong to US commonwealths.
Reply
Reply
But flying it is starting to look cheaper.
Reply
At least it is still cheaper than the UK.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment