Essays FTL.

Apr 21, 2007 18:04

Especially ones that don't use the standard MLA format that all my previous humanities teachers pounded into my head. Oh no, that's not good enough! This professor wants Chicago format! With footnotes. What, parenthetical citation isn't fancy enough or something? Stupid footnotes ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Scientific Writing dr_daven April 23 2007, 14:07:48 UTC
It's nice that scientific papers are have a standardized format for writing. Of course, they do that by forcing you to write in a pathetically boring, completely oppressive passive voice. Data was analyzed, and mind-numbing results was written. At least, you can ad a whole crapload of techincal wordage to confuse laymen, but the reviewers know more about the subject that I do.

Also, the citation format is so obsessively anal-retentive that you have to count periods and commas. And, every SINGLE scientific journal has their own preference, resulting in a 100 page PDF document, with each page listing 30 different ways of adding periods to a citation.

Not to mention I have to produce 30 pages of writing from somewhere in the next month, and as of right now, it doesn't look like it was produced by my brain, if you know what I mean.

So, Lin, I'll trade ya!

P.S. This rant has been brought to you by the Graduate Students' Procrastination Fund.
The Graduate Students' Procrastination Fund is a Political Action Committee with no affiliation to Daven Savla or any of his subsidiaries, corporate shell companies, or Take-Out vendors.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up