Doctoral Degrees in Linguistics

Feb 10, 2009 15:29

So I've been reading a lot about PhD Degrees in Humanities (Specifically anything French related), and the overwhelming consensus from professors and articles have been similar to this article: " Graduate School in the Humanities: Just Don't Go". But, while I am interested in French, I am actually much more interested in the Linguistics side of ( Read more... )

jobs

Leave a comment

tsuyogari February 10 2009, 15:00:20 UTC
Linguistics is usually lumped in with humanities, but these days it's started to be considered more of a pseudoscience.

I think the job market depends on what you specialize in. If you're looking in academia, most fields in the humanities are hugely competitive and often fruitless. However, if you do something like Computational Linguistics, you can do research in computer applications, language software, things like that. Translation is of course a possibility. And, what I plan on doing (I'm applying to Applied Linguistics programs for Fall 2010), is teaching and communications. TESOL is not the goldmine it used to be, but it's still a relatively new and growing field, especially in the US.

Reply

muckefuck February 10 2009, 15:05:55 UTC
I'm not sure what it was you meant to say, but I truly hope it wasn't really pseudoscience!

One of my colleagues used to refer to it as, "The most scientific of the humanities and the humanistic of the sciences." It was classed with the humanities at my institution whereas history was considered a social science; I think other places might have done exactly the opposite.

Reply

tsuyogari February 10 2009, 15:12:38 UTC
Haha, sorry. That's what the faculty at my school (jokingly) call it all the time, that I kinda forgot it's not the usual usage.

Reply

french_preppy February 10 2009, 15:06:05 UTC
You've piqued my interest.
Do you any Unis (American or otherwise), that have PhDs in Computational Linguistics?

Reply

tsuyogari February 10 2009, 15:15:27 UTC
Georgetown, University of Maryland, Carnegie Mellon, and University of Texas are the ones that come to mind.

Reply

ein_wunderkind February 10 2009, 15:12:23 UTC
It should be noted however that linguistics is meaningless for translation/interpretation (as in not necessary). And the job market is extremely bad in the USA, except for Spanish and certain languages specific to large immigrant communities.

Reply

flamingophoenix February 11 2009, 03:46:45 UTC
I agree that linguistics is not relevant to translation/interpretation. However, a solid foundation in linguistics can make it easier for somebody to learn a new language, especially one different from the one they grew up speaking. (For example, it's difficult for native English speakers to learn Pashto without understanding what ergativity is.)

Reply

dark_age_pearl February 10 2009, 19:02:24 UTC
It's not a pseudoscience. Linguistics is actually a subfield of anthropology. In my university, it's in the same building as psychology, but categorically it's an anthropological study.

I don't know what the job market is like, even though I should. Last year I changed my major to linguistics.

Reply

muckefuck February 10 2009, 20:38:33 UTC
Some universities may class it as such, but there's certainly no compelling reason to do so. After all, it grew out of philology, which in modern terms is more akin to textual criticism than anything else.

Reply

dark_age_pearl February 10 2009, 20:40:44 UTC
I guess it's one of those things that can be put under several different fields, depending on what your focus is. Thanks for the insight.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up