Even though nations and peoples may disappear and transition with time, oftentimes their names remain-- if even in an archaic, etymological reference. However, we sometimes take this for granted. Could these areas now so-labelled be legitimately referred to using the "old" name?
- The place-name "Vietnam" is derived from the Viet peoples, who
( Read more... )
As for Colombia versus British Columbia, they're both named after Columbus, and if I had to guess I would say the latter is named in contrast to the former. Sort of like saying "British America".
Words mean different things at different times. It's fine for someone from Latin America to call themselves Latin, since this is an accepted term; furthermore, it does have something to do with a Latin culture, in that the "Latin" term is in contrast to the assumed "Germanicness" (English-speaking cultural identity) of the USA and Canada.
Hmmm, yes. Some rather rambly thoughts. Oh well.
Reply
Absolutely!
(mind you, I prefer either "Cambrian" or "Cymric", if people can't manage "Cymro/Cymres")
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment