ABOUT STRANGE "VICTIM" - STARODUBTSEV. About justice and arbitrariness
IN DEFENSE GRIGORI GRABOVOI
"Presiding: then what is the essence of your claims against Grabovoi G.P., or are you satisfied with everything?
Victim Starodubtsev: no one apologized to me, everyone closed down..."
(Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of Moscow, dated October 22, 2008, p.32, paragraphs 13-14 from below)
On this and similar facts, the charge was created in the Tagansky court in the form of a punishment - 7 years in prison per episode (punishments were summed up according to a certain system).
Has the world seen such absurdity anywhere else?
Unless in 1937-1938, during the mass repressions in the USSR, when the system imprisoned on false denunciations and fabricated cases.
Milashina, opponent of the Teaching of Grigori Grabovoi.
Considering the unlawful trial against Grigori Grabovoi - that is, the trial directed against the Constitution, against human rights, against the laws of criminal and civil law, in general, against the laws of the universe - a simple logical conclusion was made that the customers of the criminal prosecution were representatives of terrorism. This may not be the only direction of persecution, because the interests of some opposition groups could coincide, but it is the main direction that attracted opposition forces to itself and thereby distorted the picture of understanding the vector of persecution.
For example, on March 27, 2008, Elena Milashina in her article in "Novaya Gazeta" - "Forgive me, Lord: is he really You?" offered a completely different version. The article can be found at the link, but it will not add knowledge:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080401233209/http:/www.novayagazeta.ru/data/2008/21/19.html
Milashina in her article showed so many implausible versions, variants of lies and absurd assumptions that it is impossible to judge the information that is shown to the reader without knowing the essence of the Teaching and the whole truth about the followers of the Teaching of Grigori Grabovoi.
THE VERSION ABOUT THE ALLEGED VICTIMS
She, Milashina, writes that, as if, "statements of victims by the actions of the sect have been gathering dust in the prosecutor's office for several years." (Elena Milashina, March 27, 2008) If this were true, the prosecutor's office and the court would not behave so unceremoniously, so brazenly towards even those who agreed to "stand" on their side. Maybe it was an act of forceful pressure in each individual case, or there were acts of intimidation of these people. Or maybe some rewards were promised to them? Only strange victims know this.
E. Milashina: “The investigation obscenely stalled for a long time on a single proven episode of fraud, and only a few months later, with great reluctance, “added” Grabovoi 11 more similar episodes and reclassified the charge to the fourth part of the 159th article (fraud committed by an organized group of persons ). But the employees of the all-powerful prosecutor's office failed to identify anyone from the "organized group of persons... "
E. Milashina, having all the information, should have known that the refusal to initiate criminal proceedings against G.P. Grabovoi, due to the lack of composition and events of the crime, was issued twice.
- For the first time - the Resolution on the refusal to initiate a criminal case, dated September 30, 2005, due to the absence of signs of a crime under Article 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, was signed by the Deputy Prosecutor of the Central Administrative District E.S. Shchelkunova.
- The second time - the Resolution on the refusal to initiate a criminal case, dated January 23, 2006, was signed by the Deputy Prosecutor of Moscow Nikonov M.E.
Provocateur Vorsobin in the TVC program, 2022
Therefore, it is STRANGE and ABSURD, of course, to consider the episode with the provocateur Vorsobin as "proven"...
You can see information about this from 2010;
https://maxpark.com/user/4297673057/content/4104670
Fake or not fake? Strange victim - provocateur Vorsobin
https://life-doctrine.livejournal.com/161961.html
In most cases, there were deaths in the families of these, as if, the victims. It is on this that the intimidation (by the court and the prosecutor's office) of people and their persuasion to accuse an innocent person is probably built. But this is my guess, and their choice remained their choice.
A society that does not possess the properties of eternal life, the properties of human immortality, unfortunately, such a society, at this stage of its development, does not guarantee eternal life. In every family, this tragedy is experienced in its own way, it is always grief. But to accuse Grigori Grabovoi of not insuring eternal life to someone (but he never promised it!), this guarantee cannot be given by anyone and no one at the moment on planet Earth. This is an indisputable fact in which civilization lives.
Strange "victim" STARODUBTSEV
For example, one can analyze information about a strange victim who allegedly came to a personal appointment with G.P. Grabovoi, in order to get a guarantee of the improvement of himself and his parents, - this is Vasily Alekseevich STARODUBTSEV. "Get a guarantee" is just a version, a wording, an interpretation. Even at first glance, doubts and assumptions begin. This is a former law enforcement officer of a special unit in the Interior Ministry system. Place of residence is Tambov; has a higher education, born in 1967. Such a person could not be misled.
Now many years have passed, but I remember that he was an active participant in the "СОТРУДНИКИ" ("CO-WORKERS") forum, where Grigori Grabovoi's technologies were considered and discussed in detail. He knew all the novelties of the Teaching and all the possibilities of restoring health; he asked many questions and was then already in opposition.
During the interrogation in court, Starodubtsev did not hide the fact that he communicated with the "Co-workers" on the site that distributes the Teachings of Grigori Grabovoi, where the knowledge of the Teaching was discussed, although it was a site administered by some outsiders, and not the Author of the Teaching: “Then I, in the worldwide network Internet, on the website of Grigori Grabovoi, read additional information about Grigori Grabovoi. After that, I got the impression that Grabovoi G.P. and his methods of treatment can positively affect the health of my parents."
He was not and could not be a victim, because the money was returned to Starodubtsev in the amount paid by him under an agreement with Kalashnikov.
"State Prosecutor Zotova: Did Vadyutin return to you the funds you deposited to pay for an individual seminar at Grabovoi G.P.?
Victim Starodubtsev: Yes. We met at the Oktyabrskaya metro station. I first wanted to photocopy all the documents that I subsequently handed over to him, but, as luck would have it, everything was closed. And I gave all the documents to Vadyutin. Then I really regretted it." (Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of the City of Moscow, dated October 22, 2008, p.11 par.4-5 above)
"…intent to steal someone else's property", as written in the Verdict of 07.07.2008, is MISSING.
- Firstly, the agreement was signed with Kalashnikov, not with G.P. Grabovoi.
- Secondly, the money was returned to Starodubtsev at his request, he had no material claims under the contract to Kalashnikov, especially to G.P. Grabovoi. The fact that Starodubtsev gave all the documents to Vadyutin is just the words of Starodubtsev, not confirmed by anyone or anything.
The state prosecutor Zotova deliberately distorts the information in the direction of the prosecution: “the money you contributed to pay for an individual seminar with G.P. Grabovoi”, because Zotova had already received a response from Starodubtsev earlier, he was already responsible for what he paid the money under the contract with Kalashnikov. That is, the State Prosecutor, during interrogation, forces Starodubtsev to change his testimony, in fact, forces him to lie in court, and he easily agrees.
In the same protocol, a few pages earlier it is written:
"State prosecutor Zotova: What documents did you sign with Kalashnikov?
Victim Starodubtsev: This is an agreement in which there were conditions for the production of video filming of the customer, the results of hardware-digital processing, etc."
(Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of the City of Moscow, dated October 22, 2008, p.5, par.8-9 below)
At the beginning of the interrogation, Starodubtsev stated:
"Victim Starodubtsev: <…> I also signed an agreement in the office, among the conditions of which was the video filming of the customer, an individual program for the customer’s video recording, hardware-digital processing of video recording.",
(Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of Moscow, dated October 22, 2008, p.3, par.1 from below)
It turns out that state prosecutors and judges, when interrogating strange victims, purposefully tried to change the purpose of payment in contracts with Kalashnikov to an allegedly non-existent contract for an individual meeting (or for resurrection, for example). Although almost all the contracts of the "victims" with Kalashnikov were in the criminal case, including the contract of the provocateur Vorsobin, where all the points were spelled out, but the court converted the information, distorted it into an accusatory one.
That is, the court ignored the contracts attached to the criminal case, and went by way of false expertise, KSPE, illegally issued and stained with links to international terrorism (I showed information on drug-trafficking here:
https://life-doctrine.livejournal.com/162349.html )
In the episode with Starodubtsev, they, judges and prosecutors, led to the fact that G.P. Grabovoi had to ensure for Starodubtsev the full well-being of all members of his family, which was written into the Verdict as an accusation, but in fact all the information is available in the court protocol:
"Lawyer Tsyganenko: Grabovoi G.P., at an individual reception, asked you for money?
Victim Starodubtsev: No.
Lawyer Tsyganenko: At the individual reception, were any documents drawn up between you and Grabovoi G.P., any contracts?
Victim Starodubtsev: No." (Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of Moscow, dated 10/22/2008, p.30, par.3-6 from the bottom).
IS IT POSSIBLE TO CONSIDER SUCH A METHOD OF OBTAINING PROOF FOR THE PROSECUTION OF AN INNOCENT PERSON NOT SATANIC WHEN IT IS SUCH?
The slander of the state prosecutor Zotova is refuted by the lawyer Tokarev, but Starodubtsev no longer refuses his words and repeats, like a mantra, that he paid for an individual meeting. This happened during all the interrogations of strange victims who confirmed the lie in court with the help of questions from state prosecutors:
"Lawyer Tokarev: You did not have a contract for an individual meeting with Grabovoi G.P.?
Victim Starodubtsev: There was no.
Lawyer Tokarev: And what did you have a contract for?
The victim Starodubtsev: For the customer's video recording, the results of hardware-digital processing and for the preparation of an individual program for the customer's video recording. But I paid for a meeting with Grabovoi G.P." (Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of Moscow, dated 10/22/2008, p.21, par.16-19 above)
"Lawyer Tokarev: Did you sign a contract for a paid event with Kalashnikov?
Victim Starodubtsev: Yes." (Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of Moscow, dated 10/22/2008, p.28, paragraphs 6-7 above)
No one considered the lawyers' questions and answers to them when drawing up a deliberately false guilty Verdict in the name of the Russian Federation, dated 07.07.2008, as if there was no line of defense at all.
"State prosecutor Zotova: What did you say to Grigori Petrovich when you went to see him?
Victim Starodubtsev: I sat down and began to tell him that I was studying, practicing his theory, talked about my work according to his methodology. Grabovoi G.P. told me that I have potential opportunities and that the result will be. I also showed him photos of my relatives." (Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of Moscow, dated 10/22/2008, p.7, par.11-12 above)
This is the protocol of the Tagansky court, an official document! Do we see here the "energy of psychological impact", as it is written in the illegal Verdict in the name of the Russian Federation, if Starodubtsev himself tells G.P. Grabovoi about his work???
Starodubtsev - with his skills, education, passed hot spots, participation in Internet forums, etc. - could influence anyone himself, in principle that's what he did.
“Victim Starodubtsev: <...> Subsequently, all Grigory Petrovich's employees shied away from me: Kalashnikov, Vadyutin...”
I have already shown that the court did not want to attach a record of the meeting between Pankratova Zh.K. and G.P. Grabovoi.
( https://life-doctrine.livejournal.com/162349.html ).
The recording of the meeting of the provocateur Vorsobin was destroyed by the court immediately after the illegal verdict. The lawyers insisted on its examination, but the examination was never carried out by the court.
Starodubtsev confirms that he had a recording of his meeting with G.P. Grabovoi, but the court most likely did not want to attach the recording to the criminal case so that the illegal accusation would be recorded in court, and not refuted by the audio recording.
When asked by lawyer Tsyganenko, he says that there is no record:
“Lawyer Tsyganenko: Do you have an audio recording of the conversation that took place during an individual appointment with Grabovoi G.P.?
Victim Starodubtsev: No. (Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of the City of Moscow, dated October 22, 2008, p.17, par.12-13 from below).
To the question of the state prosecutor Zotova, he says:
“State prosecutor Zotova: And why did you decide that he had to say this?
Victim Starodubtsev: I paid money, including for diagnostics. Grabovoi had to see the future and report the death of my brother. We were told at a seminar in May 2002 that Grigori Petrovich would help us with any questions. At a personal reception, Grabovoi G.P. tested me, all my conversation with him was recorded on a dictaphone. (Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of the City of Moscow, dated October 22, 2008, p.11, par.5-6 below).
There are thousands, not hundreds, of such inconsistencies and contradictions in an illegal case: that is, there are a huge number of errors and deliberately created false or differently interpreted facts in the direction of the prosecution; although any contradiction should be interpreted only in the direction of the accused.
So, Starodubtsev claims that he allegedly paid money for diagnostics, although the diagnostics of him or his family are not prescribed in any contract. On what basis (or under what contract) G.P. Grabovoi "should have seen the future and reported the death" of his brother? But the court relies only on Starodubtsev's opinion that allegedly someone said that "at a seminar in May 2002, they said that Grigori Petrovich would help us with any questions"? (G.P. Grabovoi helps everyone, transferring knowledge to the whole world for many years, everyone can take this knowledge.)
By the way, we will emphasize that the seminar in 2002, which Starodubtsev attended, was free, that Starodubtsev did not talk to G.P. Grabovoi in 2002 and could not personally convey to him any requests and messages about his family, as he falsely interpreted it in court, and the court inserted it into illegal conviction: [G.P. Grabovoi] "in response to the request of the latter about the cure of his parents, A.V. Starodubtsev and A.V. Starodubtseva, from their existing diseases, "assured the victim of a favorable outcome regarding the reason for the appeal."
Studying carefully the protocol of interrogation of Starodubtsev, we see in the text that Starodubtsev did not voice such requests to G.P. Grabovoi, according to the version of the court, on June 20, 2003, at about 10 p.m., although Starodubtsev himself did not remember the exact date of the visit to G.P. Grabovoi. He, Starodubtsev, simply assumed that supposedly Grigori Petrovich knew everything himself, and he, Starodubtsev, wrote his request back in 2002 on some form.
"Victim Starodubtsev: <...> In May 2002, I attended a free seminar of Grabovoi G.P., held in the premises of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry. There, in addition to Grabovoi G.P., a number of comrades spoke. Before the arrival of Grigori Petrovich, they distributed questionnaires to all those present, where it was necessary to indicate their requests and wishes. I indicated a large number of diagnoses in this questionnaire." (Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of Moscow, dated October 22, 2008, p.3, paragraph 7, above).
Whose questionnaire it was, because "besides G.P. Grabovoi, a number of other comrades spoke," this is no longer important for Starodubtsev. The main thing is that he himself decided that he paid for those "requests and wishes", although they were written on someone's questionnaire, and the seminar in 2002 was generally free.
(Protocol of the court session of the Tagansky District Court of Moscow, dated 10/22/2008, p.7, par.3-6 from the bottom):
"State Prosecutor Zotova: Did Grabovoi G.P. look at the photographs of your relatives that you showed him?
Victim Starodubtsev: Yes, he did.
The state prosecutor Zotova: Did G.P. Grabovoi ask you any questions about these photos?
The victim Starodubtsev: Grigori Petrovich, after looking at the photos, nodded, and I thought he understood everything. Grigori Petrovich also told me at the end: "Everything will be fine!", and I went home in high spirits."
The Tagansky District Court in the Verdict describes the action that G.P. Grabovoi allegedly "assured the victim of a favorable outcome regarding the reason for the appeal." So, the court, it turns out, relies only on the words of Starodubtsev, that there was a NOD by G.P. Grabovoy. The very request of Starodubtsev "about the cure of his parents, A.V. Starodubtsev and A.V. Starodubtseva, from their existing diseases" was not uttered at a meeting with G.P. Grabovoi, because Starodubtsev himself spoke and told first, and only then Grigori Petrovich, after looking at the photos, nodded... That is, a promise (to whom? and about what?) nothing is confirmed, except that Starodubtsev thought about something. Was it a nod or a turn of the head? Starodubtsev considered that it was a "nod", and it no longer mattered that there were no words, not just any promises. Doesn't matter for whom? For the court, of course, because any nod could be designated as "using the energy of psychological influence" (as it is written in the charge). And for Starodubtsev, everything was important, so at the end of the meeting, he, as if, heard the words of G.P. Grabovoi that everything will be fine.
And when it's "everything will be fine!" and for whom? Maybe "everything will be fine" for us, for civilization? You can't take every word of a clairvoyant literally, verbatim: they - those who see the future - have their own view of reality, and events in this reality have their own time criteria.
So why did Starodubtsev allegedly hear these words - "everything will be fine"? And why wasn't an audio recording of the meeting between Starodubtsev and G.P. Grabovoi attached, from our point of view? Because in the protocol of the International Public Association "Charter DRUGG" experts deciphered this moment of interrogation in the following way:
“Prosecutor Zotova - <…> Grabovoi anything… Did he even look at these photos that you showed?
Starodubtsev - looked, looked.
Prosecutor Zotova - looked… Did he say something to you...?
Starodubtsev - you know, it was like such a nod, which is - "I understand everything, everything will be fine."
Prosecutor Zotova - is that how you regarded it for yourself?
Starodubtsev - yes, I regarded it that way for myself, but there was nothing to say. But then, when the recorder was turned off, the conversation was completed, there the phrase sounded like this: “well, everything will be fine.” Do you understand? - this is such a final chord..."
Starodubtsev probably believed that he had received a guarantee of security, eternal life for himself and relatives, a norm in infinity, having been at an individual meeting with G.P. Grabovoi, and the court supported him in this delusion, assigning punishment to G.P. Grabovoi in the form of 7 years in prison for this episode.
Unfortunately, in fact, civilization has not reached such a level of its development to guarantee eternal life to any person, and it is unlikely to reach it soon, because the methods and technologies of G.P. Grabovoi are ignored or not perceived by a large number of people due to the illegal and absurd verdict of the Tagansky court, which has not yet been canceled. That is, G.P. Grabovoi should be fully acquitted.
This “nod” (or turn of the head), without words at all, was easily converted by the Tagansky court into text in an illegal SENTENCE: <…>
Grabovoi G.P. <…> "assured the victim of a favorable outcome regarding the reason for the appeal." (Sentence, dated 07.07.2008, p. 5, para. 2 above)
Who converted G.P. Grabovoi's nod into an illegal SENTENCE?
The presiding judge Ivanova E.A., judges Konovalova N.V. and Kazakov M.Yu., with the participation of state prosecutors Sinyushina E.A. and Zotova Yu.V. - they formed the verdict with their questions, directed the victims' answers in the right direction of the given prosecution template.
"The names, surnames and houses of Grabovoi's accomplices are known even to journalists. Moreover, for a long time (about a year before Grabovoi's arrest), the sect was actively developed by employees of the relevant department of the central office of the FSB. They worked out connections between Grabovoi's entourage and high-ranking officials. Now the FSB officers involved in the sect have quit or been transferred to other departments, and the dossier with operational information on the "grabovists" remains without movement." Elena Milashina
We regret that there are no employees and there is no way to call someone to account for illegal actions against a Teacher.
Milashina, on the other hand, regrets that it is impossible to destroy the ideology of saving the world, the ideology of life and truth, instead of her slander and malice, instead of the ostentatious confrontation paid for by accomplices of terrorism against thousands of people with a positive ideology of the possible restoration of everything and everyone.
Afterword.
The principle of the illegal accusation of G.P. Grabovoi in all episodes was approximately the same. Investigator Breev included a comprehensive socio-psychological examination in the indictment, dated October 05, 2006.
The comprehensive socio-psychological examination (CSE) was conducted illegally and unreasonably, with many violations, that is, the evidence was obtained in violation of the requirements of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation; it could not be the basis of the charges. On page 64 of the expert opinion, it is said about the pseudo-political activity of the social movement of the DRUGG Party, although the organizing committee of the party was officially registered on March 20, 2004 in the Ministry of Justice.
However, the Tagansky court, contrary to all laws, left CSE in the indictment. Judges and prosecutors arranged court sessions so that the answers of witnesses - both strange victims and defense witnesses - could be written into the accusatory text of CSE. The Court relied on CSE as the main evidence, despite the fact that the institutions' links with international drug-trafficking were revealed (the employees of these institutions, Prokopishin and Kudeyarova, signed CSE).
Court against G.P. Grabovoi was conducted under the condition of personal interest of the court, emotionally, which contradicts the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. This is exactly the circumstance that was visible to everyone and, as if, lay on the surface.
Another circumstance - "there are grounds to believe that criminal case No. 376062 through, as if, an intermediate link is under pressure from the international terrorist Osama bin Laden" - this circumstance was hidden; on the other hand, it was repeatedly voiced in the Tagansky court.
UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES
Protocol of the court session: 1) Place of the meeting: Moscow, Marxist lane, 1/32;
Courtroom No. 107;
Date of the meeting: 25.04.2007 Start time: 13:10; End time: 18:10;
2) Criminal case No. 376062 against Grabovoi G.P.
Grabovoi G.P.: "That is, by definition, any of my activities are not fraudulent, and I should not be prosecuted - under any circumstances.
The following: any of the circumstances of my activities in the areas - healthcare, forecast control, education, science, culture, politics, sociology, religion - excludes the criminality of my deeds, therefore excludes any form of punishments. Stated accusation, in my opinion, and I substantiate this, is a threat to the National Security of Russia, a threat to the whole World..."
Antonina Kravtsova, witness for the defense in the Tagansky court in an illegal case against G.P. Grabovoi.