Fake or not fake? Strange victim - provocateur Vorsobin
IN DEFENSE OF GRIGORI GRABOVOI.
"Who determines - fake or not fake?
But it's not easy here in Russia either. Deputy Khinstein has come up with a new law that will punish (up to 15 years) not only for fakes about our Armed Forces, but also about foreign policy structures of state power, including Rossotrudnichestvo. Now, the impression, for any careless word you can go to jail?" (POLITICS, Exclusive kp.ru, March 21, 2022, 12:47,
https://www.kp.ru/daily/27378/4561158/ )
This is quite new from Vorsobin…
Of course, the journalist seems to be on the crest of an information wave (or war?). He is even slightly deceitful and allegedly shy to pronounce the word "WAR", although his entire professional activity is connected with the information war. But in that life (before the physical war), he never looked back at the words he uttered, always slandered, lied and propagandized what “his journalistic executive duty ordered him to do" in relation to Grigori Petrovich Grabovoi, that is, the main "hero" of his slanderous publications.
They, with the journalist D. Sokolov-Mitrich, seemed to compete in superiority - who would write the most absurd slander. As one author, Ivan Orlov, wrote in defense of G.P. Grabovoi: "A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will not escape (Proverbs 19:5)."
A "press colleague", Sergey Konviz, wrote an article about the journalist when Vorsobin went to Tuva: "PRESS PROVOCATEUR VORSOBIN” / No. 28 for August 25, 2010 / The newspaper "RISK". That is, this person acquired the status of a provocateur not only among the followers of the Author of the Teachings on Salvation, but his provocative activity was much broader.
Prominent figures of culture, science, and art were involved to convince the slander and introduce it to the masses: for example, the late physicist Zh.I. Alferov; A. Arkhangelsky, popular on television, along with his author's program, Evgeny Knyazev from the Vakhtangov Theater, and even the well-beloved Mikhail Zadornov… And what did they lack for happiness? Just like in the days when the good names of Sakharov and Solzhenitsyn were destroyed…
As is known, Vorsobin traveled to Central Asia in the spring of 2010, to the city of Tashkent, where G.P. Grabovoi worked for a long time. What crime did Vorsobin commit there, using Central Asian hospitality? - law enforcement agencies have yet to find out. In the practice of the newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda”, including by the journalist Vorsobin, an agent network of law enforcement agencies is illegally used. This is proved by the fact of an interview published in “KP” on August 16, 2006.
At that time Vorsobin, as part of an organized criminal group, planned to influence M. Panarin, accused of terrorism: M. Panarin, accused of terrorism, whose trial ended on 02.02.2007 with a life sentence, was in the same cell with G.P. Grabovoi.
The terrorist M. Panarin, in an interview with the newspaper “Komsomolskaya Pravda” in August 2006, reported his negative attitude towards Grabovoi G.P., since G.P. Grabovoi hid from him scientific formulas for calculating digitizations for counter-terrorism measures. In relation to G.P. Grabovoi, Article 33, Part 2 of Federal Law No. 103-FZ was violated, according to which "suspects and accused of terrorism are held separately from other suspects and accused". Also, part 3 of Art. 10 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation was not observed in relation to G.P. Grabovoi, according to which he had to be kept in conditions that excluded a threat to his life and health.
The criminal purpose of the KP representatives was to create an information cover by this publication for possible agent actions related to the influence on G.P. Grabovoi. However, this did not happen even after the above interview with M. Panarin to the KP correspondent.
Since May 3, 2006, Grigori Petrovich Grabovoi has been considered an official public figure, as the DRUGG Party was officially registered, and he was its leader, who announced that he would run for president in 2008. Therefore, Article 277 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation should be applicable to G.P. Grabovoi as a victim. Public figures, including opposition parties, movements and organizations existing in the legal field of the Russian Federation, that is registered in accordance with the procedure established by law and carrying out their activities in accordance with Russian legislation, can be recognized as victims of these crimes. Although the party was not banned or recognized as an opposition, it ceased to exist due to the illegal criminal prosecution of its leader.
That is, the law allows the side of G.P. Grabovoi’s defense to actively defend itself, using the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, to identify customers, agents and other representatives of terror hoping for information cover from the media, or for their own power, connections or money.
Aiding terrorism is provided for in Article 205.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Vorsobin's actions fall under this article, plus the use of his official position: the creation of a photorobot in the editorial office of KP, the coverage of provocative slanderous actions in the newspapers of the Publishing House “Komsomolskaya Pravda”.
So, we came to the logical conclusion that the customer of the criminal prosecution of G.P. Grabovoi were representatives of terrorists, which is proved by:
1. the presence of the terrorist M. Panarin, who was subsequently sentenced to life, in the same cell with G.P. Grabovoi;
2. the detention of Grigori Grabovoi after his offer of anti-terrorist technologies to the whole world for free;
3. in the TV program "Vesti" of the RTR TV channel on 18.09.2006, it was officially said that the customer of the criminal prosecution of G.P. Grabovoi was the international terrorist Osama Bin Laden.
The fraud charge brought against G.P. Grabovoi was essentially formed in order to hinder anti-terrorist activities using Grigori Grabovoi's technologies.
Further, a simple conclusion is that all the actions of the media aimed at one goal - to put G.P. Grabovoi into prison - contained all signs of assistance to terrorism. The direct executor of this assistance was V. Vorsobin. There were clearly not enough articles in the media: as we remember, there was a refusal to initiate criminal proceedings twice, so a direct provocation was organized with a photorobot and a lie about the promise of resurrection.
Of the thousands of people who attended the author’s seminars and public lectures of Grigori Grabovoi, only one - special correspondent of the "KP" Vladimir Vorsobin - was officially recognized as the only victim. The institution of criminal proceedings under article 159, paragraph 2, of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is dated 20 March 2006 and was signed by M.E. Nikonov, Deputy Prosecutor of the city of Moscow. The decision on the victim recognition of Vorsobin V.V. from 23.03.2006 is in the criminal case 376062.
On March 20, 2006, Grigori Petrovich Grabovoi made an open offer to donate anti-terrorist technologies to the whole world.
How can there be such a coincidence: the day of the transfer of anti-terrorist technologies to the whole world and the initiation of a criminal case against Grigori Grabovoi? This all refers to simple conclusions - signs of assistance to terrorism.
Let us draw attention to the fact that from October 2005 to March 2006, not a single alleged "victim" could be brought to initiate an illegal criminal case against Grigori Petrovich Grabovoi. These strange "victims" were attracted by a massive attack of all media - radio, television, print media - after Vorsobin was recognized as a victim. Everyone was promised the payment of money…
The money for the provocation with the photorobot was officially issued by the editorial office, and after the publication (stuffing) of information about the allegedly promised resurrection of the children of Beslan, Vorsobin was issued a bonus: "Order 930-d of September 22, 2005 on awarding Vorsobin V.V. in the amount of 45,632 rubles." (СС 376062, vol.2, sheet 250), "An expense cash order for Vorsobin V.V. to receive a prize of 39700 rubles.00 kopecks dated 29.09.2005 (СС 376062, vol.2, sheet 251). As we can see, Vorsobin's provocation was generously paid for and, most importantly, very quickly, because the journalist Vorsobin was at a personal meeting with Grigori Petrovich from September 19 to 20, 2005.
The explanation clearly shows that V.V. Vorsobin did not spend any of his money, which confirms the absence of material damage to him. This also testifies to the crime of V.V. Vorsobin under Part 2 of Article 129 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (knowingly false information discrediting honor and dignity, combined with the accusation of a person of committing a serious crime).
I ask you to pay attention to the special cynicism of the commission of a crime by V.V. Vorsobin. On 09/19/2005, V.V. Vorsobin signs an Application for gratuitous works on the topic "Resurrection" by G.P. Grabovoi: "I am acquainted with the fact that all works on the topic of Grigori Grabovoi's Teaching "On Resurrection" are carried out free of charge" (Volume 11, sheet 247) and, nevertheless, gives deliberately false slanderous information about the theft of money from him.
How was it possible to resist slander and absurdity, which are financed, as follows from the logical conclusion, by representatives of terrorists? By the way, the financial investments in this campaign were huge, taking into account the regular articles in the media in Russia and abroad, radio and television airtime for many years. And after all, it is constantly coordinated, as if it is being improved with the help of information technologies and conscientious weapons. So, the actions directed against this absurdity, in the form of an illegal sentence in the name of the Russian Federation, were made by hundreds of people.
How to see it?
The search for court cases is in the public domain, that is, any citizen can see this information.
Notes found: 1453
Courts of general jurisdiction of the city of Moscow
https://mos-gorsud.ru/fastsearch?q=%D0%93%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9+%D0%93.%D0%9F.&page=74
Grabovoi G.P.
Notes found: 1453 on 97 pages. FOR EXAMPLE, page 74 OF 97:
4у-1407/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court). Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Dragolyubova L.A.
4у-8445/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Kolomiets L.F.
4у-2716/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Dagunts E.E.
4у-1418/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Norkina E.V.
4у-3566/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Zhabskaya S.V.
4у-1677/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Gorb L.V.
4у-4090/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Dmitrienko F.P.
4у-1921/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Kravtsova A.I.
4у-4091/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Nekrasova L.V.
4у-6315/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Skladnyuk D.N.
4у-4602/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Nosan L.V.
4у-3576/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Netaeva N.P.
4у-1940/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Kazalova V.V.
4у-6950/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Mokin A.S.
4у-7600/2009, Review of criminal cases of cassation instance (Moscow City Court) Parties: The accused: Grabovoi G.P., the Applicant (other): Sobol N.F.
Review of criminal cases of cassation instance - Moscow City Court (screenshot).
The link allows you to view applications only to the Moscow City Court. These notes do not take into account those statements in defense of G.P. Grabovoi, which were continuously submitted to the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation throughout all the years of illegal persecution, civil courts in defense of the Teacher and against slander on the pages of the media, on television are not taken into account.
After the release of G.P. Grabovoi, there was a publication of the KP on 22.07.2010, in which deliberately false information was given that Grigori Grabovoi was engaged in his recovery and which were refuted by the defense side with objective data that G.P. Grabovoi was healthy.
Having shamelessly slandered a noble person, probably feeling your insignificance in a hopeless struggle with the truth, you, Vorsobin, continue to slander even now, trying to assert and impose some kind of your false ideology in your actions as a provocateur, as if covering up your activities related to aiding terrorism. But a provocateur is always a provocateur.
If you were just talking nonsense, then one could only regret it, however, you imagine yourself to be the leading prosecutor of those processes that you have never understood. Your slanderous publications cannot be ignored by contemporaries, because in them you, as it were, sanctioned the massacre of the best man on the planet, that is, you, as it were, got used to the role of Pontius Pilate (not Breev, no, namely, you wanted to be a prosecutor (procurator?). But you made a mistake, you're just the one who sold out for 30 pieces of silver… You were also issued a bonus (on a cash order) so that you would receive an amount that coincided with your slander about allegedly carrying out a resurrection that was not promised or carried out by anyone - 39700.
On the Internet, on one of the forums, it was suggested that V. Vorsobin may belong to the sect of Satanists. Maybe that's why he is really afraid of resurrection, in principle, as a process alien to this essence, which may turn into retribution for him.
...who sold his soul to the devil cannot serve the gods.
Antonina Kravtsova, defense witness in case No. 376062 against G.P. Grabovoi in the Tagansky court.
Translated into English by Elena Dagunts, defense witness in the criminal case against Grigori Grabovoi.