BTW, I miss your ranks on the limp-witted Lefties.
How 'bout this line of...*cough*...'reason': Being "totally and completely PRO-CHOICE"--except when it comes to someone who, in the libwank's opinion, shouldn't be having a baby because of the burden it might place on the life of the libwank in question (even though the libwank isn't the one having the baby)? In THAT sort of instance, pro-CHOICE is out the window because the person who's pregnant "should" be having an abortion, in the libwank's opinion. So said libwanker is upset because said pregnant person CHOOSES to live up to her responsibility, remain pregnant, and raise the baby. Ooooh--such a mistake! For libs, pro-choice only applies when it's THEIR choice; when "choice" = "abortion." Because, of course, "unintended pregnancy" = "baby" = "mistake"/NOT/"human life." :p
Oh, and good thing we are discussing this here, we certainly aren;t allowed to dicuss it where the libwanks are discussing it. No, that would be BAAAAD.
1) Because everyone is gone, there is no one to attack, degrade, harass, etc. Life, as they know it, is over (not that this poster is saying they had lives to begin with........). 2) Because open-mindedness means agreeing with their view. 3) Lastly, some think that because they attack, degrade, and harass others, that those not like them do the same thing.
I know PLEN-TY of people willing to rank on this. Don't know if the evil step-libwank is around these here parts to see it though. One could only hope.
What I don't understand is why EvilStepTard won't make her stepdaugher one of those pregnant Barbies dressed up as a bride if she won't even give her a nice wedding?
How 'bout this line of...*cough*...'reason': Being "totally and completely PRO-CHOICE"--except when it comes to someone who, in the libwank's opinion, shouldn't be having a baby because of the burden it might place on the life of the libwank in question (even though the libwank isn't the one having the baby)? In THAT sort of instance, pro-CHOICE is out the window because the person who's pregnant "should" be having an abortion, in the libwank's opinion. So said libwanker is upset because said pregnant person CHOOSES to live up to her responsibility, remain pregnant, and raise the baby. Ooooh--such a mistake! For libs, pro-choice only applies when it's THEIR choice; when "choice" = "abortion." Because, of course, "unintended pregnancy" = "baby" = "mistake"/NOT/"human life." :p
How's that for something to rank on, hm? ;)
Reply
If I were her stepdaughter, I wouldn't even let the bitch hold the baby after it was born. I think she would try to kill it outside of the womb.
I could easily turn this into a rant about how some Baby Boomers are the most selfish and self-centered portion of the US population...
Reply
Oh, and good thing we are discussing this here, we certainly aren;t allowed to dicuss it where the libwanks are discussing it. No, that would be BAAAAD.
Reply
Reply
2) Because open-mindedness means agreeing with their view.
3) Lastly, some think that because they attack, degrade, and harass others, that those not like them do the same thing.
Reply
>:]
Reply
Reply
I have the nasty urge to play with Photoshop and express my true feelings in an artistic way...
>:]
Reply
Go for it!
Reply
Reply
Reply
:GASP: How dare someone get pee on a Holy Book! :GASP:
But in the same breath, they'll tell us how it's perfectly fine to burn the American flag and how they can desecrate the Christian Bible.
I'm trying to think of some more... I'll be sure to share them as they come to me.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment