Pretty much. The hate among cat people seems to be for 'cat food you buy in grocers', as opposed to 'real' cat food you buy from specialist pet suppliers.
I have to say my previous cats ate Whiskas (the leading 'grocer' brand in the UK) and were fine on it.
This is obviously biased in the sense that it's produced by the company, but their testing policy doesn't sound unreasonable to me. As far as I can see, some years ago they were using a laboratory with very poor conditions, but they stopped doing so. PETA (I think it's them) run another site called iamscruelty but I find it a bit unconvincing as it seems to conflate past and present.
I'm a bit unconvinced by PETA in general, especially as at one place I looked at on that site they're suggesting that there's a healthy way to feed a cat on a vegetarian diet. There isn't. Cats eat meat.
And how can one test cat food if not on animals? On prison inmates? Public schoolboys (who presumably would see it as a great improvement)?
Reply
I have to say my previous cats ate Whiskas (the leading 'grocer' brand in the UK) and were fine on it.
Reply
Possibly on old people whose pensions are too low to have a decent standard of living.
Reply
Good luck with the benefits quote; should, at least, be interesting.
Reply
Good luck with the benefits quote; should, at least, be interesting. And I certainly can understand not wanting to work for These People.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment