I was all excited about reading all my journal articles about music, the first Amendment and subliminal messages until I came across this in the "Skeptical Inquirer" dissing legal commentary on the subject
( Read more... )
You say no subliminal invitation to comment, and yet the word comment appears 5 times in the post! And like a moth to the flame i have fallen for it
( ... )
According to "experts", subliminal messages are things you are unaware of receiving and becomes misattributed as your own inner motivation. Because you discovered my trick, you should've consciously been able to ignore or comply with my commands as you "see fit".
I feel like I need a friggin' psychology degree to understand this whole subliminal messages thing.
I agree that "the human mind works in mysterious ways) some people may be more vulnerable than others so is it appropriate to base legal liability which could potentially (if not definitely) infringe our fundamental right of freedom of expression based on such a contentious theory?
Comments 2
Reply
I feel like I need a friggin' psychology degree to understand this whole subliminal messages thing.
I agree that "the human mind works in mysterious ways) some people may be more vulnerable than others so is it appropriate to base legal liability which could potentially (if not
definitely) infringe our fundamental right of freedom of expression based on such a contentious theory?
Thank you for your contribution though.
Reply
Leave a comment