Phantom of the Oy-pera.

Jan 09, 2006 10:05

OK, I admit that I don't hate The Phantom of the Opera. I was a young teenager when I first saw it and it was fun, a spectacle. I also liked the old Gaston LeRoux fiction on which it was based -- a good pulp read.

But today, Phantom replaces Cats as the longest-running show on Broadway.

Well, it was sad in the first place when Cats took that ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

leleboo January 9 2006, 20:26:50 UTC
Yeah, we caught the end and that was definitely genius of a must-watch-while-drunk type. :)

My parents -- who as you know can be vaguely theatre-snobbish -- actually enjoyed Mamma Mia, which sort of amazes me. Then again, I believe one goes to that show expect, well, a Tony-and-Tina-meets-ABBA experience; if one goes for quote-unquote theatre, it's a bust.

I agree that, no, we can't make a judgment of a theatregoer's taste based on choosing among several terrible shows, and I also agree that the more the bottom line takes over, the more crap reigns (cf. indie films versus studio blow-em-up-fests, for the uber-obvious example).

I'm not one of those who think theatre has to be deep or unenjoyable to be good, of course. (Did you know John Simon was fired at age 80 because he gave a good review to Chitty Chitty Bang Bang?) I just happen to think that this particular show has outlived any usefulness it may ever have had (like Mel's comment above, where the once-groundbreaking tech is now ho-hum and so it barely even counts as "spectacle" anymore). Does it mean it should never be seen again? Nah. Might it be the only Broadway show, and in fact only stage show ever, seen by someone? Sure! Am I still sad that Broadway would rather ensconce it and laud it than take risks on other, possibly better (never a guarantee) shows? Hell yeah.

And I also know that I'm coming at it from the literary critic's viewpoint that theatre should even have usefulness, have a point or a meaning or something that leaves a viewer thinking about his or her life afterwards. Clearly, it's not all about that.

(BTW, I know we're on the same side here -- so I'm not arguing, just elaborating.)

Still and all? Oy. :)

Reply

eblizelteth January 9 2006, 23:15:02 UTC
To be perfectly honest, I should have admitted upfront that I am very much down on theatre these days, so I'm coming from a particularly biased perspective. I don't know if I've misplaced my grown-up attention span or if I've lost my patience with theatre generally as a mode of expression (I've certainly lost my patience with theatrical dialogue, due in no small part to the travesty that was Closer), but it takes a lot to get me to see a show these days.

Also, I fucking hate - HATE - Wicked.

All this being said, I am very much looking forward to my roommate's upcoming show: Heddatron. Hedda Gabler ... with robots.

Reply

leleboo January 9 2006, 23:19:23 UTC
Yeah, I'm the same. I'm the worst theatre-goer ever these days; I just have no patience. I've never seen Wicked and I have no desire to. Granted, I still adore the Into the Woods soundtrack -- and I always will -- but it's definitely nostalgic at this point

Hedda Gabler, however, can only be improved by robots. :)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up