for the love of drama
i think i am not alone when i say that every girl has this hidden desire to have a shane west-mandy moore love story even once in their life. maybe its because the sweetest thing a guy can do for a girl is transform from an established player/badboy/bane of teenage society to a sweet, sensitive and considerate man--or i don't know. girls like that sort of power: to change a guy for the better. but why cant we be content with finding an already good guy and have to go for the changing-a-bad-guy-into-a-good-guy in the first place?
bringing us to the ultimate yet simple question: dao ming xi or hua ze lei?
if you haven't watched meteor garden, shame on you. but seriously, when faced with two guys at different ends of the male spectrum who will win a girl's heart? one of them may be extremely cocky and obnoxious but does the most unexpected things like going to a zoo with you while you are babysitting for your neighbor when he hates those kinds of places and children all together. on the other hand. the other is the quiet, mysterious yet genuinely altruistic musician who prefers to be alone but finds solace in sharing his life with you. do you choose the one who you are sure will not hurt you even in the slightest way possible or the one who you have to watch over because the world doesnt seem to believe that he is serious with you?
why is it that girls have a tendency to choose guys who have the higher capacity to break their hearts? is it in our nature to seek the highest possible amount of drama by increasing the risk of getting hurt?
of course, im not saying there aren't any exceptions. for example, most girls--even if they already developed a liking for a certain guy--will go to great heights in making the guy feel otherwise: not answering calls, making them feel like they like someone else, endlessly arguing with them and sometimes even getting physically rough with them with the occasional punches, kicks and scratches. why--if the girl could only cut the crap and just tell the guy that she liked him then things would be fine and dandy with no time wasted, right? i know some girls who say that they do those things in order to test the guy (and i have to admit, i am guilty of this too) if he really will persist or if he really had the patience for her. but do girls REALLY think that if a guy really had an intention of hurting them that they wouldn't do it after he put up with all that crap? why can't women cut the crap and keep things simple? (not to the offense of the female race and to the praise of the males--its not like they like to keep things simple too) i think i know the answer.
to our eternal distress and psychological imbalance,
i think the curse of the female race is our high affinity for drama.
we complain about the lack of it
and we complain about the presence of it.
we are an entirely different subspecies of crap.
bringing us to the ultimate yet simple question: dao ming xi or hua ze lei?
if you haven't watched meteor garden, shame on you. but seriously, when faced with two guys at different ends of the male spectrum who will win a girl's heart? one of them may be extremely cocky and obnoxious but does the most unexpected things like going to a zoo with you while you are babysitting for your neighbor when he hates those kinds of places and children all together. on the other hand. the other is the quiet, mysterious yet genuinely altruistic musician who prefers to be alone but finds solace in sharing his life with you. do you choose the one who you are sure will not hurt you even in the slightest way possible or the one who you have to watch over because the world doesnt seem to believe that he is serious with you?
why is it that girls have a tendency to choose guys who have the higher capacity to break their hearts? is it in our nature to seek the highest possible amount of drama by increasing the risk of getting hurt?
of course, im not saying there aren't any exceptions. for example, most girls--even if they already developed a liking for a certain guy--will go to great heights in making the guy feel otherwise: not answering calls, making them feel like they like someone else, endlessly arguing with them and sometimes even getting physically rough with them with the occasional punches, kicks and scratches. why--if the girl could only cut the crap and just tell the guy that she liked him then things would be fine and dandy with no time wasted, right? i know some girls who say that they do those things in order to test the guy (and i have to admit, i am guilty of this too) if he really will persist or if he really had the patience for her. but do girls REALLY think that if a guy really had an intention of hurting them that they wouldn't do it after he put up with all that crap? why can't women cut the crap and keep things simple? (not to the offense of the female race and to the praise of the males--its not like they like to keep things simple too) i think i know the answer.
to our eternal distress and psychological imbalance,
i think the curse of the female race is our high affinity for drama.
we complain about the lack of it
and we complain about the presence of it.
we are an entirely different subspecies of crap.