If so, I can see that the extra 10bhp+ and the 20kg weight saving are essential upgrades for a bike that weighs slightly less than a fried breakfast and makes 160bhp at the crank as standard...
Re: PS: Is this the exhaust?landsmandApril 25 2009, 22:49:40 UTC
It's an aesthetic issue more than anything else. The standard cans are horrendously ugly, I mean, earthshakingly, stomach-churningly, legwettingly ugly.
Re: PS: Is this the exhaust?khaylockApril 26 2009, 00:23:43 UTC
> legwettingly
Yes I understand that this can be a problem for the more elderly motorcyclist amongst us. But can I suggest you first try a more appropriate and targeted solution than all that Yoshimura bling?
If so, I can see that the extra 10bhp+ and the 20kg weight saving are essential upgrades for a bike that weighs slightly less than a fried breakfast and makes 160bhp at the crank as standard...
Reply
Reply
Yes I understand that this can be a problem for the more elderly motorcyclist amongst us. But can I suggest you first try a more appropriate and targeted solution than all that Yoshimura bling?
( ... )
Reply
Reply
( ... )
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment