Dec 18, 2013 21:19
Peeps aren't using their critical thinking skills. Sea World is the largest research, conservation, and rehabilitation facility for marine mammals in the world. Captive-born whales can not be "returned" to the wild.
:doesn'tunderstandpeepswhotakeonesourceatfacevalue:
really?,
stupidity
Leave a comment
Circuses do not, in general, give back to the world in science and rescue, though Gunther Gebel-Williams did a lot towards improving the lives of all circus animals through his work and enlightened the public to the actual needs, abilities, and intelligence of elephants and wild cats in particular. So, no, I don't see a comparison between circuses and the shows that Sea World puts on.
If the protestors prevailed and Sea World closed their 'active' exhibits which involve trainers working with animals in public, the trainers would still be working the animals that weren't euthanized to meet the realities of a decreased budget. All animals in captivity require physical and mental stimulation daily and most thrive with a daily routine. Deprived of that stimulation, especially intelligent and social animals like whales and dolphins, captive animals become depressed and physical ill. Sea World just opens that routine activity up to the public, including physical interaction with the dolphins. Sure, they dress it up more with lights and music, but the money they make benefits thousands of animals living free through all their other science and education projects.
If the protestors don't mind a decrease in response to mass strandings or boat-injured manatees or turtles with cracked shells, than by all means, they should try to keep cutting Sea World's profits and hope that donations to small non-profits and universities with marine programs can fill the gap. If upper-class celebrities who can afford to see orca hunting salmon in the wild want to deprive the vast majority of the rest of the population the ability to see these magnificent animals for themselves, then by all means, euthanize all the captive born whales to end their 'suffering'.
Hee! I'm still ranting, aren't I? Don't get me started on judges and OSHA personnel stepping on the toes of trainers, behaviorists, biologists, and scientists who have spent their lifetimes working physically with captive large marine mammals and think they know and understand the complex working relationships involved better than those people doing it everyday.
Reply
If that practice is still going on and it's for no reason beyond replacing an animal for a performance, and let me emphasize that I have no idea whether this is the case, then I think it's worth it to put some pressure on the parks. I'm not in support of releasing the whales that are already in captivity, or leaving them without stimulation. I just think that if an old whale in a tank leaves this world, there's no need to replace him with a young whale from the ocean.
Reply
Sea World has changed A LOT even over the last ten years. They are hugely oriented towards education.
Reply
Aside from educating ourselves, though, I think our responsibility is to accept that depriving Sea World of its whales means that we can't go to Sea World and see a whale. That doesn't call for a boycott, it calls for supporting the park when it does something right - paying the price for a ticket even though the show's become less spectacular.
(Sorry, been absentee for probably obvious reasons. Merry Christmas!)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment