There is a thing that I do not understand.
In
this Newsarama article, an interview with Dan Didio, I am excited by very many things: the idea of multiple Wonder Woman titles, the integration with Milestone (though I am anxious about that, as well as excited about the re-emergence of the characters), and the return to a nonlinear continuity.
(
What I do not and find I cannot understand is this: )
And I refuse to believe that was required in order to age them, or advance the titles, in such a way as to be interesting to the readers. It has to be possible to go forward without going down. I reject the idea that the only true changes are bad ones.
Which is also one of the frustrating things about Green Arrow and Black Canary. They got what should have been a positive change, years late and through incredible struggle, and it seems something only their generation of heroes is allowed post-OYL. And then? And then, horrible things just have to happen anyway. The title careens from horrifying life-destroying crisis one to the next. Is no one allowed to have a positive change?
That's not right, and it shouldn't be so. No positive changes just careen the universe downward, and that's just what we've seen for the past how many years? No, DC. No.
Reply
Failure is not an end, it is a learning experience. DC does not seem to grasp this concept.
Reply
Leave a comment