Leave a comment

[Private // Unhackable] innovate_human July 23 2009, 15:00:09 UTC
It depends on your belief system.

In theory, the fewer people killed, the better, as there are more to learn from the example, whatever said example is.

On the other hand, there are some who say that all of those who oppose them should be wiped out so that the threat, whatever that may be, does not reoccur.

Both have their strong points, though I tend to follow the first example.

As for living out someone's wish... from what I have seen, a wish to simply destroy only brings more painful complications. Destroy when needed, but also reform when needed.

And yes. Being human is very difficult.

Reply

[Private // Unhackable] lacking_heart July 23 2009, 15:05:38 UTC
... The second example seems to fit my experience more.

From what I understood, the destruction was for the purpose of a kind of reform... All I wanted was to stay beside Kamui.

I can't decide if it was easier without emotions.

Reply

[Private // Unhackable] innovate_human July 23 2009, 15:08:04 UTC
And if everything is destroyed, what's left? There would be no one remaining to learn from the mistake.

Emotions are... difficult to manage.

Reply

[Private // Unhackable] lacking_heart July 23 2009, 15:11:08 UTC
What is left? The earth. Humans weren't... necessary.

Anger is particularly unpredictable.

Reply

[Private // Unhackable] innovate_human July 24 2009, 04:12:45 UTC
Why are humans not necessary?

And often unexpected.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up