Not everyone on the internet agrees with each other. Not everyone is kind or nice or decent. Some people are controversial, for good or for bad. It's part of how we are as a species -- we argue, we confront, we question. Some people are painful to know, to read. Some people speak frightening truths
(
Read more... )
Comments 88
Reply
Profoundly intellectually dishonest. His 'sigma male' definition sounds like the common-or-garden sociopath so I suspect that one's answer is right there.
I'm not up for withdrawing his membership, as it supports his view that women writers (who, as we all know, rule the entire universe with an iron oven glove*) are Out To Get Him, but in the UK, this would be hate speech and he almost certainly would be booted out for it. I'm not sure where US law stands on this.
*BTW next Wimmins' Illuminati Cabal is on Monday, my place. Bring cake.
Reply
Cake and wine :-)
Reply
Good lord. That idiot. He is, alas, not alone in his, ahem, views.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Hateful is the least of what can be said about him.
Previous to this I would have been hesitant to call for a revocation of membership, because that's a tool that can be abused, but attempting to use SFWA's forum to launch a hate-screed against a fellow member should certainly call for censure/banning.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment